Jens Kolb

473 total citations
11 papers, 86 citations indexed

About

Jens Kolb is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Kolb has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 86 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Management Information Systems, 8 papers in Information Systems and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Jens Kolb's work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (10 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). Jens Kolb is often cited by papers focused on Business Process Modeling and Analysis (10 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (7 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). Jens Kolb collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Jens Kolb's co-authors include Manfred Reichert, Thomas Bauer, Ralph Bobrik, Rüdiger Pryss, Henrik Leopold, Jan Mendling, Peter Dadam, Andreas Lanz, Ulrich Kreher and Stefanie Rinderle‐Ma and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design, OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) and ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review.

In The Last Decade

Jens Kolb

11 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jens Kolb Germany	6	75	56	31	14	14	11	86
Ralph Bobrik Germany	5	75 1.0×	51 0.9×	39 1.3×	7 0.5×	3 0.2×	8	82
José Matías Rivero Argentina	6	16 0.2×	106 1.9×	22 0.7×	15 1.1×	37 2.6×	13	151
Shabnam Kumari India	6	20 0.3×	54 1.0×	30 1.0×	3 0.2×	3 0.2×	17	109
Matthias Kunze Germany	5	47 0.6×	40 0.7×	25 0.8×	5 0.4×	1 0.1×	12	65
Jan Claes Belgium	5	75 1.0×	53 0.9×	37 1.2×	5 0.4×		9	98
Timotheus Kampik Sweden	6	22 0.3×	17 0.3×	60 1.9×	6 0.4×	4 0.3×	30	108
Jean-Sébastien Sottet Luxembourg	7	16 0.2×	37 0.7×	34 1.1×	18 1.3×	52 3.7×	27	118
Ludwin Fuchs United States	4	17 0.2×	28 0.5×	18 0.6×	25 1.8×	38 2.7×	9	86
Stacy Hobson United States	3	71 0.9×	59 1.1×	33 1.1×	11 0.8×		11	86
Helmut Balzert Germany	4	18 0.2×	33 0.6×	24 0.8×	2 0.1×	17 1.2×	11	82

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Kolb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Kolb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Kolb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Kolb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Kolb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Kolb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Kolb. The network helps show where Jens Kolb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Kolb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Kolb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Kolb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Kolb. Jens Kolb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2015). Context-Aware Process Injection Enhancing Process Flexibility by Late Extension of Process Instances. 127–145. 4 indexed citations

2.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2015). Collaborative process modeling with tablets and touch tables - A controlled experiment. 5240. 31–41. 1 indexed citations

3.

Kolb, Jens, Henrik Leopold, & Jan Mendling. (2015). Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2015). 2 indexed citations

4.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2014). How social distance of process designers affects the process of process modeling. 9. 1364–1370. 2 indexed citations

5.

Kolb, Jens & Manfred Reichert. (2013). A flexible approach for abstracting and personalizing large business process models. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review. 13(1). 6–18. 12 indexed citations

6.

Kolb, Jens & Manfred Reichert. (2013). Data flow abstractions and adaptations through updatable process views. 1447–1453. 10 indexed citations

7.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2013). Gesture-Based Process Modeling Using Multi-Touch Devices. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design. 4(4). 48–69. 8 indexed citations

8.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2012). Updatable Process Views for Adapting Large Process Models: The proView Demonstrator.. 6–11. 6 indexed citations

9.

Reichert, Manfred, Jens Kolb, Ralph Bobrik, & Thomas Bauer. (2012). Enabling personalized visualization of large business processes through parameterizable views. 1653–1660. 23 indexed citations

10.

Kolb, Jens, et al.. (2012). Model-driven user interface generation and adaptation in process-aware information systems. OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University). 5 indexed citations

11.

Reichert, Manfred, Peter Dadam, Stefanie Rinderle‐Ma, et al.. (2009). Enabling Poka-Yoke Workflows with the AristaFlow BPM Suite. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact