Jens Hoff

545 total citations
11 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Jens Hoff is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Hoff has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence and 1 paper in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Jens Hoff's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (8 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers). Jens Hoff is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (8 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers). Jens Hoff collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Jens Hoff's co-authors include Matthias Steinhauser, Jonathan Grigo, Kirill Melnikov, Takahiro Ueda, Alexey Pak, Andrey Grozin, Peter Marquard, William B. Kilgore and A. Hasselhuhn and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Computer Physics Communications.

In The Last Decade

Jens Hoff

11 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jens Hoff Germany	8	335	28	10	7	6	11	343
Christian Brønnum-Hansen Germany	9	243 0.7×	20 0.7×	17 1.7×	7 1.0×	7 1.2×	13	259
Stephan Buehler Switzerland	7	238 0.7×	27 1.0×	6 0.6×	3 0.4×	5 0.8×	7	247
Valery Yundin Germany	8	240 0.7×	22 0.8×	18 1.8×	6 0.9×	12 2.0×	19	251
David Heymes Germany	6	339 1.0×	23 0.8×	7 0.7×	3 0.4×	10 1.7×	9	352
J. Blümlein Germany	5	366 1.1×	10 0.4×	6 0.6×	9 1.3×	9 1.5×	7	386
Bernd Jantzen Germany	5	237 0.7×	72 2.6×	11 1.1×	8 1.1×	7 1.2×	5	256
P. Mastrolia Italy	7	332 1.0×	20 0.7×	7 0.7×	3 0.4×	6 1.0×	9	356
Taushif Ahmed India	9	274 0.8×	25 0.9×	4 0.4×	3 0.4×	3 0.5×	19	291
Paul Fiedler Germany	4	500 1.5×	46 1.6×	8 0.8×	2 0.3×	15 2.5×	4	513
Mathias Ritzmann Switzerland	7	322 1.0×	19 0.7×	7 0.7×	2 0.3×	7 1.2×	8	335

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Hoff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Hoff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Hoff. The network helps show where Jens Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Hoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Hoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Hoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Hoff. Jens Hoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Hoff, Jens. (2015). Methods for multiloop calculations and Higgs boson production at the LHC. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 4 indexed citations

2.

Hasselhuhn, A., et al.. (2015). Exact N3LO results for qq′ → H + X. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(7). 13 indexed citations

3.

Grigo, Jonathan, Jens Hoff, & Matthias Steinhauser. (2015). Higgs boson pair production: Top quark mass effects at NLO and NNLO. Nuclear Physics B. 900. 412–430. 67 indexed citations

4.

Hoff, Jens, et al.. (2014). Adequate bases of phase space master integrals for gg → h at NNLO and beyond. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(9). 20 indexed citations

5.

Hoff, Jens, et al.. (2013). MT: A Mathematica package to compute convolutions. Computer Physics Communications. 185(2). 528–539. 24 indexed citations

6.

Hoff, Jens, et al.. (2013). Higgs boson production at the LHC: NNLO partonic cross sections through order ϵ and convolutions with splitting functions to N3LO. Physics Letters B. 721(4-5). 244–251. 42 indexed citations

7.

Grigo, Jonathan, Jens Hoff, Kirill Melnikov, & Matthias Steinhauser. (2013). On the Higgs boson pair production at the LHC. Nuclear Physics B. 875(1). 1–17. 98 indexed citations

8.

Grigo, Jonathan, Jens Hoff, & Kirill Melnikov. (2013). Higgs boson pair production at the LHC: top-quark mass effects at next-to-leading order. 6. 2 indexed citations

9.

Grigo, Jonathan, Jens Hoff, Peter Marquard, & Matthias Steinhauser. (2012). Moments of heavy quark correlators with two masses: Exact mass dependence to three loops. Nuclear Physics B. 864(3). 580–596. 26 indexed citations

10.

Hoff, Jens & Matthias Steinhauser. (2011). Moments of heavy–light current correlators up to three loops. Nuclear Physics B. 849(3). 610–627. 7 indexed citations

11.

Grozin, Andrey, et al.. (2011). Simultaneous decoupling of bottom and charm quarks. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2011(9). 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact