Jenny Eachus

888 total citations
8 papers, 667 citations indexed

About

Jenny Eachus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jenny Eachus has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 667 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Jenny Eachus's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). Jenny Eachus is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (2 papers). Jenny Eachus collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Jenny Eachus's co-authors include George Davey Smith, Stephen Frankel, Jenny Donovan, Carol Propper, T. J. Peters, Megan Williams, Matthew J. Grainge, Max Bachmann, Rosemary Greenwood and Paul Dieppe and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and Diabetic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jenny Eachus

8 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jenny Eachus United Kingdom	8	237	138	133	129	118	8	667
Claudia Lagacé Canada	12	214 0.9×	82 0.6×	81 0.6×	124 1.0×	57 0.5×	16	711
A Golden United States	2	116 0.5×	92 0.7×	100 0.8×	30 0.2×	40 0.3×	2	492
Daniella Pires Nunes Brazil	15	275 1.2×	205 1.5×	106 0.8×	70 0.5×	99 0.8×	63	902
Jung Hye Sung United States	17	96 0.4×	69 0.5×	167 1.3×	45 0.3×	58 0.5×	38	688
S. McKenzie Australia	16	264 1.1×	23 0.2×	121 0.9×	98 0.8×	50 0.4×	31	730
Geoffrey Gibson United States	16	139 0.6×	27 0.2×	61 0.5×	79 0.6×	79 0.7×	37	1.0k
E. van de Lisdonk Netherlands	8	120 0.5×	27 0.2×	174 1.3×	46 0.4×	66 0.6×	12	605
E Dickinson United Kingdom	12	248 1.0×	55 0.4×	106 0.8×	53 0.4×	145 1.2×	22	707
In‐Sun Kwon South Korea	9	249 1.1×	60 0.4×	50 0.4×	36 0.3×	93 0.8×	38	642
Adam Biener United States	11	149 0.6×	43 0.3×	60 0.5×	135 1.0×	88 0.7×	23	699

Countries citing papers authored by Jenny Eachus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenny Eachus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenny Eachus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenny Eachus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenny Eachus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenny Eachus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenny Eachus. The network helps show where Jenny Eachus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenny Eachus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenny Eachus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenny Eachus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenny Eachus. Jenny Eachus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Propper, Carol, et al.. (2005). Access to health care resources in the UK: the case of care for arthritis. Health Economics. 14(4). 391–406. 26 indexed citations

2.

Bachmann, Max, Jenny Eachus, C Hopper, et al.. (2003). Socio‐economic inequalities in diabetes complications, control, attitudes and health service use: a cross‐sectional study. Diabetic Medicine. 20(11). 921–929. 149 indexed citations

3.

Frost, A., Jenny Eachus, J M Sparrow, et al.. (2001). Vision-related quality of life impairment in an elderly UK population: Associations with age, sex, social class and material deprivation. Eye. 15(6). 739–744. 38 indexed citations

4.

Frankel, Stephen, Jenny Eachus, Rosemary Greenwood, et al.. (1999). Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet. 353(9161). 1304–1309. 159 indexed citations

5.

Eachus, Jenny, et al.. (1999). An additional dimension to health inequalities: disease severity and socioeconomic position.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 53(10). 603–611. 88 indexed citations

6.

Peters, T. J., I M Harvey, Max Bachmann, & Jenny Eachus. (1998). Does requesting sensitive information on postal questionnaires have an impact on response rates? A randomised controlled trial in the south west of England.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 52(2). 130–130. 11 indexed citations

7.

Eachus, Jenny, Megan Williams, George Davey Smith, et al.. (1996). Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of health. BMJ. 312(7026). 287–292. 174 indexed citations

8.

Peters, T. J. & Jenny Eachus. (1995). Achieving equal probability of selection under various random sampling strategies. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 9(2). 219–224. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact