Jenée N. Smith

934 total citations
9 papers, 745 citations indexed

About

Jenée N. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jenée N. Smith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 745 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in Jenée N. Smith's work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (5 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers). Jenée N. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (7 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (5 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (3 papers). Jenée N. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Egypt. Jenée N. Smith's co-authors include Brian M. M. Ahmer, Fred Heffron, Bindhu Michael, Simon Swift, Jitesh A. Soares, Jessica L. Dyszel, Matthew C. Swearingen, Anice Sabag-Daigle, Glenn M. Young and Roy Curtiss and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Journal of Bacteriology.

In The Last Decade

Jenée N. Smith

9 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jenée N. Smith United States	9	527	299	287	229	117	9	745
Shouji Yamamoto Japan	17	322 0.6×	257 0.9×	428 1.5×	140 0.6×	147 1.3×	40	804
D Liu Australia	8	383 0.7×	312 1.0×	297 1.0×	173 0.8×	283 2.4×	8	798
M R Wilmes-Riesenberg United States	7	310 0.6×	273 0.9×	180 0.6×	209 0.9×	113 1.0×	7	660
L. K. Romana Australia	12	410 0.8×	294 1.0×	258 0.9×	229 1.0×	294 2.5×	13	828
Kaymeuang Cam France	18	732 1.4×	711 2.4×	310 1.1×	112 0.5×	288 2.5×	19	1.1k
Matthew Lefebre United States	11	265 0.5×	303 1.0×	294 1.0×	119 0.5×	202 1.7×	12	719
Byoung Sik Kim South Korea	17	454 0.9×	255 0.9×	543 1.9×	111 0.5×	144 1.2×	38	876
Véronique Robbe‐Saule France	9	225 0.4×	235 0.8×	212 0.7×	279 1.2×	162 1.4×	11	578
María Eugenia Castelli Argentina	15	426 0.8×	188 0.6×	143 0.5×	78 0.3×	76 0.6×	23	695
Bentley Lim United States	10	626 1.2×	223 0.7×	234 0.8×	74 0.3×	75 0.6×	16	767

Countries citing papers authored by Jenée N. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenée N. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenée N. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenée N. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenée N. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenée N. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenée N. Smith. The network helps show where Jenée N. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenée N. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenée N. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenée N. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenée N. Smith. Jenée N. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Ali, Mohamed Medhat, David L. Newsom, Juan F. González, et al.. (2014). Fructose-Asparagine Is a Primary Nutrient during Growth of Salmonella in the Inflamed Intestine. PLoS Pathogens. 10(6). e1004209–e1004209. 59 indexed citations

Sabag-Daigle, Anice, et al.. (2012). The Acyl Homoserine Lactone Receptor, SdiA, of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Does Not Respond to Indole. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 78(15). 5424–5431. 48 indexed citations

Dyszel, Jessica L., et al.. (2010). E. coli K-12 and EHEC Genes Regulated by SdiA. PLoS ONE. 5(1). e8946–e8946. 65 indexed citations

Smith, Jenée N., et al.. (2010). Salmonella SdiA Recognizes N-acyl Homoserine Lactone Signals from Pectobacterium carotovorum in Vitro, but Not in a Bacterial Soft Rot. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 23(3). 273–282. 34 indexed citations

Dyszel, Jessica L., Jenée N. Smith, Jitesh A. Soares, et al.. (2009). Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Can Detect Acyl Homoserine Lactone Production by Yersinia enterocolitica in Mice. Journal of Bacteriology. 192(1). 29–37. 80 indexed citations

Smith, Jenée N., Jessica L. Dyszel, Jitesh A. Soares, et al.. (2008). SdiA, an N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Receptor, Becomes Active during the Transit of Salmonella enterica through the Gastrointestinal Tract of Turtles. PLoS ONE. 3(7). e2826–e2826. 75 indexed citations

Ahmer, Brian M. M., et al.. (2007). Methods in Cell-to-Cell Signaling in Salmonella. Methods in molecular biology. 394. 307–322. 10 indexed citations

Smith, Jenée N. & Brian M. M. Ahmer. (2003). Detection of Other Microbial Species bySalmonella: Expression of the SdiA Regulon. Journal of Bacteriology. 185(4). 1357–1366. 132 indexed citations

Michael, Bindhu, Jenée N. Smith, Simon Swift, Fred Heffron, & Brian M. M. Ahmer. (2001). SdiA of Salmonella enterica Is a LuxR Homolog That Detects Mixed Microbial Communities. Journal of Bacteriology. 183(19). 5733–5742. 242 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact