Jen‐Chung Liao
About
In The Last Decade
Jen‐Chung Liao
54 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Surgery 899
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 861
- Biomedical Engineering 285
- Pharmacology 253
- Molecular Biology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Jen‐Chung Liao
This map shows the geographic impact of Jen‐Chung Liao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen‐Chung Liao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen‐Chung Liao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jen‐Chung Liao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen‐Chung Liao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen‐Chung Liao. The network helps show where Jen‐Chung Liao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jen‐Chung Liao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jen‐Chung Liao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jen‐Chung Liao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jen‐Chung Liao. Jen‐Chung Liao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | 35 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.