This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Manza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Manza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Manza more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Manza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Manza. The network helps show where Jeffrey Manza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey Manza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey Manza.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey Manza based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey Manza. Jeffrey Manza is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Manza, Jeffrey & Clem Brooks. (2016). Why Aren’t Americans More Angry About Rising Income Inequality?.1 indexed citations
2.
Uggen, Christopher, Jeffrey Manza, & Angela Behrens. (2013). ‘Less than the average citizen’: stigma, role transition and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. 261–293.69 indexed citations
3.
Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, & Jeffrey Manza. (2012). State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 2010.41 indexed citations
4.
Manza, Jeffrey & Michael Sauder. (2009). Inequality and Society: Social Science Perspectives on Social Stratification.11 indexed citations
Brooks, Clem & Jeffrey Manza. (2007). Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision.8 indexed citations
7.
Uggen, Christopher & Jeffrey Manza. (2004). Voting and Subsequent Crime and Arrest: Evidence from a Community Sample. 36. 193–215.23 indexed citations
8.
Uggen, Christopher & Jeffrey Manza. (2004). Lost Voices: The Civic and Political Views of Disenfranchised Felons. 165–204.14 indexed citations
9.
Manza, Jeffrey, Fay Lomax Cook, & Benjamin I. Page. (2002). Navigating Public Opinion : Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. Medical Entomology and Zoology.86 indexed citations
10.
Manza, Jeffrey, et al.. (2000). ‘Still the Missing Feminist Revolution? Inequalities of Race, Class, and Gender in Introductory Texts.’ [Comment on Ferree and Hall, ASR Dec 1996]. American Sociological Review. 64.
Manza, Jeffrey & Clem Brooks. (1997). Partisan Alignments of the “Old” and “New” Middle Classes. 143–157.1 indexed citations
14.
Manza, Jeffrey. (1995). Policy experts and political change during the New Deal. UMI Dissertation Services eBooks.3 indexed citations
15.
Manza, Jeffrey, Michael Hout, & Clem Brooks. (1995). Class Voting in Democratic Capitalist Societies Since World War II: Dealignment, Realignment, or Trendless Fluctuation?. International Review of Sociology. 21.1 indexed citations
16.
Manza, Jeffrey. (1992). Postindustrial Capitalism, the State, and the Prospects for Economic Democracy. 20.2 indexed citations
17.
Manza, Jeffrey. (1992). Classes, Status Groups, and Social Closure: A Critique of Neo-Weberian Social Theory. 12. 275–302.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.