Jeff Sherman

1.9k citations
27 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jeff Sherman

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jeff Sherman
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 88
  • Artificial Intelligence 238
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 55
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 211
Replace E. Oelker with:
E. Oelker United States
T. E. Mehlstäubler Germany
Benjamin Bloom United States
G. Santarelli France
Malcolm B. Gray Australia
Zeb W. Barber United States
Travis Nicholson United States
G. von Winckel United States
Z. H. Lu China
Tianchu Li China
Jeff Sherman relative to E. Oelker United States E. Oelker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
E. Oelker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Sherman. The network helps show where Jeff Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeff Sherman Line = papers co-authored together Jeff Sherman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20231
3 20232
4 201986
5 20188
6 201775
7 201625
8 201620
9 201492
10 201327
11 201286
12 20129
13
p-Wave cold collisions in a Yb lattice clock
20111
14 201156
15 2011299
16
Implementation of a symmetric surface electrode ion trap with field\n compensation using a modulated Raman effect
200945
17 2008221
18 200829
19 200539
20 20025

About Jeff Sherman

Jeff Sherman is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy and Ophthalmology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (18 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (11 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (11 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (5 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (3 papers) and GNSS positioning and interference (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (88 citations), Artificial Intelligence (238 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (55 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (211 citations). Jeff Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew D. Ludlow, C. W. Oates, N. Lemke, Richard W. Fox, Li Ma, Yanyi Jiang, D. J. Szwer, D. T. C. Allcock, Gergely Imreh and Michael J. Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Optica, Physical Review A, Nature Communications and Metrologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026