Jean-Marc Thouret
About
In The Last Decade
Jean-Marc Thouret
6 papers receiving 229 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 154
- Emergency Medicine 99
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 51
- Surgery 41
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 36
Countries citing papers authored by Jean-Marc Thouret
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean-Marc Thouret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean-Marc Thouret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean-Marc Thouret more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean-Marc Thouret
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean-Marc Thouret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean-Marc Thouret. The network helps show where Jean-Marc Thouret may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean-Marc Thouret
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean-Marc Thouret. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean-Marc Thouret based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean-Marc Thouret. Jean-Marc Thouret is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 64 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 63 | |
| 6 | 83 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.