Jean‐Loup Demory
- Genetics top 2%
- Hematology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- F BautersBrigitte DupriezJean-Luc Laı̈Yvon SterkersClaude PreudhommePierre FenauxEric WattelDominique Bordessoule
- Topics
- Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers)Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (7 papers)Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (6 papers)
- Cited by
- GeneticsHematologyRheumatology
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Loup Demory
12 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Genetics 570
- Hematology 491
- Molecular Biology 269
- Rheumatology 175
- Oncology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Loup Demory
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Loup Demory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Loup Demory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Loup Demory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Loup Demory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Loup Demory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Loup Demory. The network helps show where Jean‐Loup Demory may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Loup Demory
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Loup Demory. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Loup Demory based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Loup Demory. Jean‐Loup Demory is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | CASE REPORTS in HAEMATOLOGY (Paper co-edited with the European LeukemiaNet) Isolated trisomy 2 is non-random and may be found in myelodysplastic syndrome and in acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Case 1 | 0 |
| 9 | [Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnosis and treatment]. | 1 |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | La splénomégalie myéloïdeMise à jour des critères diagnostiques, des facteurs pronostiques et du traitement | 1 |
| 12 | 132 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 295 |
About Jean‐Loup Demory
Jean‐Loup Demory is a scholar working on Genetics, Hematology and Rheumatology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (7 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (570 citations), Hematology (491 citations) and Rheumatology (175 citations). Jean‐Loup Demory has collaborated with scholars based in France, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include F Bauters, Brigitte Dupriez, Jean-Luc Laı̈, Yvon Sterkers, Claude Preudhomme, Pierre Fenaux, Eric Wattel, Dominique Bordessoule, John T. Reilly and Giovanni Barosi. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, British Journal of Haematology and Genes Chromosomes and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.