Jean-François Vibert
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Shigeaki MatsuokaWilliam W. SutherlingDouglas S. GoodinFrançois Mauguı̀ereMichael J. AminoffMarc R. NuwerKhashayar PakdamanPierre‐Yves Boëlle
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers)stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Jean-François Vibert
28 papers receiving 713 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Cognitive Neuroscience 289
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 106
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 86
- Psychiatry and Mental health 85
- Neurology 82
Countries citing papers authored by Jean-François Vibert
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean-François Vibert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean-François Vibert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean-François Vibert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean-François Vibert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean-François Vibert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean-François Vibert. The network helps show where Jean-François Vibert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean-François Vibert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean-François Vibert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean-François Vibert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean-François Vibert. Jean-François Vibert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 92 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 87 | |
| 19 | Dopaminergic Neuromodulation Brings a Dynamical Plasticity to the Retina | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jean-François Vibert
Jean-François Vibert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Modeling and Simulation and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 30 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (289 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (77 citations) and Neurology (82 citations). Jean-François Vibert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Uruguay and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Shigeaki Matsuoka, William W. Sutherling, Douglas S. Goodin, François Mauguı̀ere, Michael J. Aminoff, Marc R. Nuwer, Khashayar Pakdaman, Pierre‐Yves Boëlle, Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine and Gilles Hejblum. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.