Jean d’Aspremont
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law top 5%
- Strategy and Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (19 papers)International Law and Aviation (5 papers)International Arbitration and Investment Law (5 papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of International LawJournal of International Relations and DevelopmentLeiden Journal of International Law
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jean d’Aspremont
21 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Political Science and International Relations 140
- Sociology and Political Science 58
- Law 45
- Strategy and Management 36
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 18
Countries citing papers authored by Jean d’Aspremont
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean d’Aspremont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean d’Aspremont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean d’Aspremont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean d’Aspremont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean d’Aspremont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean d’Aspremont. The network helps show where Jean d’Aspremont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean d’Aspremont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean d’Aspremont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean d’Aspremont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean d’Aspremont. Jean d’Aspremont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | The Professionalization of International Law | 2 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Jean d’Aspremont
Jean d’Aspremont is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Law, having authored 27 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (19 papers), International Law and Aviation (5 papers) and International Arbitration and Investment Law (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (140 citations), Law (45 citations) and Strategy and Management (36 citations). Jean d’Aspremont has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Samantha Besson, W. Michael Reisman, Math Noortmann, Tanja Aalberts and Makane Moïse Mbengue. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of International Law, Journal of International Relations and Development and Leiden Journal of International Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.