Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean Carletta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean Carletta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean Carletta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean Carletta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean Carletta. The network helps show where Jean Carletta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean Carletta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean Carletta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean Carletta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jean Carletta. Jean Carletta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Renals, Steve, Jean Carletta, Keith Edwards, et al.. (2014). ROCKIT. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 39–42.2 indexed citations
Murray, Gabriel, Steve Renals, Jean Carletta, & Johanna D. Moore. (2006). Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Main Conference.29 indexed citations
6.
Murray, Gabriel, Steve Renals, Jean Carletta, & Johanna D. Moore. (2005). Evaluating Automatic Summaries of Meeting Recordings. ERA. 33–40.48 indexed citations
Murray, Gabriel, Steve Renals, & Jean Carletta. (2005). 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005 - Eurospeech). Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.2 indexed citations
Carletta, Jean, et al.. (2005). A generic approach to software support for linguistic annotation using XML. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 449–459.12 indexed citations
11.
Nissim, Malvina, Shipra Dingare, Jean Carletta, & Mark Steedman. (2004). An Annotation Scheme for Information Status in Dialogue.. Language Resources and Evaluation.57 indexed citations
12.
Carletta, Jean, Shipra Dingare, Malvina Nissim, & Tatiana Nikitina. (2004). Using the NITE XML Toolkit on the Switchboard Corpus to study syntactic choice: a case study. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1019–1022.13 indexed citations
13.
Carletta, Jean, et al.. (2003). A model of back-channel acknowledgements in spoken dialogue. Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 51–58.
Soria, Claudia, Niels Ole Bernsen, Jean Carletta, et al.. (2002). Advanced Tools for the Study of Natural Interactivity. Language Resources and Evaluation.5 indexed citations
17.
Carletta, Jean, Anne H. Anderson, & Simon Garrod. (2002). Towards Sciences of Linguistic Communication. Seeing Eye to Eye: An Account of Grounding and Understanding in Work Groups.. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives. 9(1). 26–45.1 indexed citations
18.
Carletta, Jean & Amy Isard. (1999). Proceedings of Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse, ACL99 Workshop.1 indexed citations
West, Michael, Simon Garrod, & Jean Carletta. (1997). Group decision-making and effectiveness:unexplored boundaries. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.