This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Wentworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Wentworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Wentworth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Wentworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Wentworth. The network helps show where Jay Wentworth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay Wentworth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay Wentworth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay Wentworth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jay Wentworth. Jay Wentworth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Klein, Julie Thompson, Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2002). Strategies for Using Interdisciplinary Resources Across K-16.1 indexed citations
2.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2002). Interdisciplinary Program Assessment.8 indexed citations
3.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2002). Rules Are Not the Way to Do Interdisciplinarity: A Response to Szostak.8 indexed citations
4.
Vars, Gordon F., Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2002). Educational Connoisseurship, Criticism, and the Assessment of Integrative Studies.12 indexed citations
5.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2002). "Navigating the Disciplinary Fault Lines" 1 in Science and in the Classroom: Undergraduate Neuroscience Classroom in Mind, Brain, and Behavior at Harvard.4 indexed citations
6.
Allen, Katherine R., et al.. (2002). Interdisciplinarity as Self and Subject: Metaphor and Transformation.3 indexed citations
7.
Adams, Marianne, et al.. (2002). Expressive Arts Therapy: Creative Process in Art and Life.16 indexed citations
8.
Newell, William H., Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2001). A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies.175 indexed citations
9.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2001). Contending with Complexity: A Response to William H. Newell's "A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies".5 indexed citations
10.
Meek, Jack W., Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2001). The Practice of Interdisciplinarity: Complex Conditions and the Potential of Interdisciplinary Theory.6 indexed citations
11.
Newell, William H., Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2001). Reply to the Respondents to "A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies".7 indexed citations
12.
Klein, Julie Thompson, Jay Wentworth, & David Sebberson. (2001). Interdisciplinarity and the Prospect of Complexity: The Tests of Theory.16 indexed citations
13.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2001). The Columbia Basin as a Metaphor for an Interdisciplinary Approach.1 indexed citations
14.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (2001). Another Approach to Interdisciplinary Studies.11 indexed citations
15.
Warfield, John, et al.. (1999). A Role for Formalisms in Integrative Studies. 19(8). 26–7.1 indexed citations
16.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (1999). Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity: A Constant Challenge to the Sciences.45 indexed citations
17.
Wentworth, Jay, et al.. (1999). Venturing Into Interdisciplinary Tasks: Common Challenges for Faculty and Students.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.