Jay Reimer

529 citations
6 papers · 408 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Surgery top 10%
    • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques

Papers in

    • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 5
    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 5

Jay Reimer

6 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Jay Reimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Biomaterials 312
  • Surgery 304
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 149
  • Biomedical Engineering 114
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 50
Replace Matthew T. Lahti with:
Matthew T. Lahti United States
Repin Oleg Germany
Maniuc Liviu Germany
Masashi Yamanami Japan
Renée Duijvelshoff Netherlands
Malîga Oxana Germany
Klaus Hoeffler Germany
Jacques Scherman South Africa
Karolina Theodoridis Germany
Stefanie Ringes‐Lichtenberg Germany
Jay Reimer relative to Matthew T. Lahti United States Matthew T. Lahti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Matthew T. Lahti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Reimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Reimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Reimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Reimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Reimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Reimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Reimer. The network helps show where Jay Reimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jay Reimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Reimer Line = papers co-authored together Jay Reimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Jay Reimer

Jay Reimer is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomaterials, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Computer Networks and Communications and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 6 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (5 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (1 paper), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Interconnection Networks and Systems (1 paper) and Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (312 citations), Surgery (304 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (149 citations), Biomedical Engineering (114 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (50 citations). Jay Reimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Tranquillo, Zeeshan H. Syedain, James M. Berry, Matthew T. Lahti, Richard W. Bianco, Sandra L. Johnson and Lee A. Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials, Nature Communications and Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact