Jay Parker

1.3k total citations
80 papers, 907 citations indexed

About

Jay Parker is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jay Parker has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 907 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Geophysics, 23 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 23 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jay Parker's work include earthquake and tectonic studies (36 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (19 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (17 papers). Jay Parker is often cited by papers focused on earthquake and tectonic studies (36 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (19 papers) and Earthquake Detection and Analysis (17 papers). Jay Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Singapore. Jay Parker's co-authors include Andrea Donnellan, Marlon Pierce, John B. Rundle, Jun Wang, M. B. Heflin, K. W. Hudnut, G. A. Lyzenga, M. T. Glasscoe, E. J. Fielding and Frédéric Cappa and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Geophysical Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Jay Parker

74 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jay Parker United States 16 407 185 157 138 131 80 907
Tomoaki Yamada Japan 23 1.5k 3.7× 68 0.4× 34 0.2× 149 1.1× 354 2.7× 113 1.8k
K. R. Anderson United States 23 1.0k 2.5× 111 0.6× 23 0.1× 51 0.4× 220 1.7× 75 1.6k
Jack K. Cohen United States 16 959 2.4× 15 0.1× 248 1.6× 91 0.7× 39 0.3× 49 1.6k
James Miller United States 15 93 0.2× 617 3.3× 94 0.6× 49 0.4× 30 0.2× 60 1.5k
Nancy Collins United States 20 55 0.1× 70 0.4× 15 0.1× 338 2.4× 23 0.2× 39 1.5k
J. Torquil Smith United States 20 1.5k 3.7× 12 0.1× 17 0.1× 132 1.0× 78 0.6× 50 1.9k
S. E. Minson United States 24 2.3k 5.6× 126 0.7× 72 0.5× 86 0.6× 1.1k 8.0× 63 2.7k
Scott Stephens New Zealand 19 27 0.1× 139 0.8× 101 0.6× 284 2.1× 36 0.3× 44 1.0k
S. R. Ford United States 21 841 2.1× 31 0.2× 12 0.1× 7 0.1× 191 1.5× 56 1.2k
J.J. Vaccaro United States 15 7 0.0× 265 1.4× 30 0.2× 26 0.2× 67 0.5× 42 658

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Parker. The network helps show where Jay Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay Parker. Jay Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glasscoe, M. T., et al.. (2022). High‐Resolution Finite Fault Slip Inversion of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Using 3D Finite Element Modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 127(9). 4 indexed citations
2.
Granat, Robert, Andrea Donnellan, M. B. Heflin, et al.. (2021). Clustering Analysis Methods for GNSS Observations: A Data‐Driven Approach to Identifying California's Major Faults. Earth and Space Science. 8(11). e2021EA001680–e2021EA001680. 17 indexed citations
3.
Evans, James P., et al.. (2020). GEOLOGIC AND GEODETIC ANALYSES TO DEFINE THE LOCATION, CREEP, TRIGGERED SLIP, SLIP RATE, AND GEOMETRY WITHIN A VOLUMINOUS HIDDEN SPRING FAULT ZONE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
Heflin, M. B., Andrea Donnellan, Jay Parker, et al.. (2020). Automated Estimation and Tools to Extract Positions, Velocities, Breaks, and Seasonal Terms From Daily GNSS Measurements: Illuminating Nonlinear Salton Trough Deformation. Earth and Space Science. 7(7). 35 indexed citations
6.
Donnellan, Andrea, Jay Parker, Christopher Milliner, et al.. (2018). UAVSAR and Optical Analysis of the Thomas Fire Scar and Montecito Debris Flows: Case Study of Methods for Disaster Response Using Remote Sensing Products. Earth and Space Science. 5(7). 339–347. 10 indexed citations
7.
Donnellan, Andrea, Jay Parker, Lisa Grant Ludwig, & Egill Hauksson. (2014). Activation of Fault Structures South of the La Habra Earthquake Rupture As Evidenced By UAVSAR Imaging. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014.
8.
Donnellan, Andrea, Jay Parker, Brian Hawkins, et al.. (2014). Combined UAVSAR and GPS Estimates of Fault Slip for the M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake. AGUFM. 2014. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hudnut, K. W., Shengji Wei, Andrea Donnellan, et al.. (2013). Extremely Shallow Extensional Faulting Near Geothermal Fields. AGUFM. 2013. 1 indexed citations
10.
Donnellan, Andrea & Jay Parker. (2011). UAVSAR Indication of Right-Lateral Faults in Southern California. AGUFM. 2011. 1 indexed citations
11.
Glasscoe, M. T., Rolf Blom, G. W. Bawden, et al.. (2011). E-DECIDER: Earthquake Disaster Decision Support and Response Tools - Development and Experiences. AGUFM. 2011. 1 indexed citations
12.
Kedar, S., Jay Parker, F. Webb, et al.. (2011). Limitations of strain estimation techniques from discrete deformation observations. Geophysical Research Letters. 38(1). n/a–n/a. 11 indexed citations
13.
Parker, Jay & Andrea Donnellan. (2008). Impact of InSAR Sampling Interval on Discrimination of Postseismic Processes. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008. 1 indexed citations
14.
Donnellan, Andrea, Jay Parker, Charles D. Norton, et al.. (2007). QuakeSim: Enabling Model Interactions in Solid Earth Science Sensor Webs. 120. 1–8. 3 indexed citations
15.
Parker, Jay. (2006). Validation of Quasi-Static methods for Southern California Deformation. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006. 1 indexed citations
16.
Norton, Charles D., et al.. (2004). Developing Parallel Active Tectonics Simulations Using GeoFEST and the PYRAMID Adaptive Mesh Refinement Library. AGUFM. 2004. 1 indexed citations
17.
Zuffada, Cinzia, et al.. (2004). Polarization Properties of the GPS Signal Scattered off a Wind-Driven Ocean. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 52(1). 172–188. 31 indexed citations
18.
Donnellan, Andrea, Dennis McLeod, Geoffrey Fox, et al.. (2003). Interoperability and Semantics for Heterogeneous Earthquake Science Data. 10 indexed citations
19.
Hurst, K., Donald F. Argus, Andrea Donnellan, et al.. (2000). The coseismic geodetic signature of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters. 27(17). 2733–2736. 24 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Jay, R. Ferraro, & Paulett C. Liewer. (1993). Comparing 3D finite element formulations modeling scattering from a conducting sphere. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 29(2). 1646–1649. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026