Jay M. Griffith

1.7k citations
19 papers · 1.5k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jay M. Griffith

19 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jay M. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 643
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 382
  • Biological Psychiatry 60
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 394
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 116
Replace M. Waldo with:
M. Waldo United States
Lawrence E. Adler United States
G J Wang United States
Karen Stevens United States
Y.‐S. Ding United States
John Gatley United States
Harry Vilkman Finland
Laura Martín United States
Julia G. Gorey United States
D. Attar-Lèvy France
Jay M. Griffith relative to M. Waldo United States M. Waldo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Waldo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay M. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay M. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay M. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay M. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay M. Griffith. The network helps show where Jay M. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay M. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay M. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together Jay M. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1992350
2 1993188
3 1994183
4 1996169
5 1991151
6 199889
7 199988
8 200853
9 199547
10 199328
11 199927
12 199527
13 199124
14 198413
15 199911
16 19939
17 19947
18 19961
19 20081

About Jay M. Griffith

Jay M. Griffith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (643 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (382 citations), Biological Psychiatry (60 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (394 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (116 citations). Jay M. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence E. Adler, Robert Freedman, Merilyne C. Waldo, Herbert T. Nagamoto, Lee Hoffer, Kara A. McRae, C. Munro Cullum, Josette G. Harris, Frederick Petty and Robert R. Freedman. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Psychiatry Research, Neuropsychobiology and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact