Jay F. Shriver
- Oceanography top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Atmospheric Science top 2%
- Ecology
- Geology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian K. ArbicJames G. RichmanAlan J. WallcraftHarley E. HurlburtE. Joseph MetzgerJames J. O’BrienMaarten C. BuijsmanRobert B. Scott
- Topics
- Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (75 papers)Climate variability and models (56 papers)Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jay F. Shriver
80 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Oceanography 2.4k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
- Atmospheric Science 1.1k
- Ecology 117
- Geology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Jay F. Shriver
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay F. Shriver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay F. Shriver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay F. Shriver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay F. Shriver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay F. Shriver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay F. Shriver. The network helps show where Jay F. Shriver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay F. Shriver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay F. Shriver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay F. Shriver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay F. Shriver. Jay F. Shriver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | Semidiurnal Internal Tide Energy Fluxes and Their Variability in a Global Ocean Model and Moored Observations | 1 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 95 | |
| 17 | An Operational Eddyresolving 1/16 Degree Global Ocean Nowcast/forecast System | 2 |
| 18 | A Real-time 1/16° Global Ocean Nowcast/Forecast System | 4 |
| 19 | An Operational Eddy Resolving Global Ocean Nowcast/Forecast System | 4 |
| 20 | The Effects of El Niño on Rainfall and Fire in Florida | 20 |
About Jay F. Shriver
Jay F. Shriver is a scholar working on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (75 papers), Climate variability and models (56 papers) and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oceanography (2.4k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations) and Atmospheric Science (1.1k citations). Jay F. Shriver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian K. Arbic, James G. Richman, Alan J. Wallcraft, Harley E. Hurlburt, E. Joseph Metzger, James J. O’Brien, Maarten C. Buijsman, Robert B. Scott, Patrick G. Timko and Bulusu Subrahmanyam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Remote Sensing of Environment and Journal of Climate.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.