Jay A. Hamm

63 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jay A. Hamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Philosophy 750
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 586
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 286
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 118
Replace Jérôme Favrod with:
Jérôme Favrod Switzerland
Hamish J. McLeod United Kingdom
Sarah Nothard United Kingdom
Johan Øhlenschlæger Denmark
Edna Hamera United States
Anton B. P. Staring Netherlands
Joy McCarron Canada
Patricia Bach United States
Jennifer Betts Australia
Victoria Reynolds United States
Jay A. Hamm relative to Jérôme Favrod Switzerland Jérôme Favrod's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jérôme Favrod · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay A. Hamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay A. Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay A. Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay A. Hamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay A. Hamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay A. Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay A. Hamm. The network helps show where Jay A. Hamm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay A. Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay A. Hamm Line = papers co-authored together Jay A. Hamm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017137
2 2012103
3 2014102
4 201278
5 201176
6 201875
7 201567
8 201460
9 202057
10 200449
11 201348
12 200946
13 201444
14 201334
15 201633
16 201532
17 201729
18 202027
19 201521
20 201818

About Jay A. Hamm

Jay A. Hamm is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (45 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (43 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (26 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (14 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (750 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (586 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (286 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (118 citations). Jay A. Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Paul H. Lysaker, Bethany L. Leonhardt, Kelly D. Buck, Ilanit Hasson‐Ohayon, Giancarlo Dimaggio, Jenifer L. Vohs, Marina Kukla, David Roe, Hamish J. McLeod and Michael Francis. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Psychology Research and Behavior Management and Journal of Psychotherapy Integration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026