Jasper Krommendijk

559 total citations
40 papers, 143 citations indexed

About

Jasper Krommendijk is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Jasper Krommendijk has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 143 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 13 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in Jasper Krommendijk's work include European and International Law Studies (25 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (16 papers) and Taxation and Legal Issues (9 papers). Jasper Krommendijk is often cited by papers focused on European and International Law Studies (25 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (16 papers) and Taxation and Legal Issues (9 papers). Jasper Krommendijk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, India and Belgium. Jasper Krommendijk's co-authors include Wessel N. Vermeulen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of European Public Policy and JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies.

In The Last Decade

Jasper Krommendijk

31 papers receiving 113 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jasper Krommendijk Netherlands	7	116	65	33	12	7	40	143
Christoph Möllers� Germany	8	128 1.1×	44 0.7×	73 2.2×	18 1.5×	3 0.4×	49	186
Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou United Kingdom	7	145 1.3×	53 0.8×	94 2.8×	24 2.0×	6 0.9×	48	174
Brian D. Lepard United States	4	77 0.7×	31 0.5×	17 0.5×	20 1.7×	5 0.7×	13	95
Li-ann Thio Singapore	6	50 0.4×	79 1.2×	37 1.1×	9 0.8×	6 0.9×	33	116
Oliver Lepsius Germany	7	61 0.5×	54 0.8×	37 1.1×	8 0.7×	5 0.7×	33	111
Anja Seibert-Fohr Germany	5	77 0.7×	40 0.6×	39 1.2×	18 1.5×	7 1.0×	29	107
Lorraine Weinrib Canada	5	99 0.9×	80 1.2×	103 3.1×	14 1.2×	11 1.6×	20	165
Markus Patberg Germany	11	186 1.6×	64 1.0×	29 0.9×	13 1.1×	11 1.6×	26	217
Zoran Oklopčić Canada	7	146 1.3×	72 1.1×	70 2.1×	8 0.7×	9 1.3×	17	177
Eirik Bjørge United Kingdom	6	87 0.8×	45 0.7×	46 1.4×	23 1.9×	3 0.4×	35	118

Countries citing papers authored by Jasper Krommendijk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jasper Krommendijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jasper Krommendijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jasper Krommendijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jasper Krommendijk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jasper Krommendijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jasper Krommendijk. The network helps show where Jasper Krommendijk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jasper Krommendijk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jasper Krommendijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jasper Krommendijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jasper Krommendijk. Jasper Krommendijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Krommendijk, Jasper, et al.. (2025). Luxembourg Has Spoken: Polish and Dutch Judges' Satisfaction With Rule of Law Judgements of the Court of Justice of the EU. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies.

Krommendijk, Jasper, et al.. (2024). How Much Trust in Times of Distrust: National Courts, the ECJ and Criminal Cooperation in an Era of Rule-of-Law Backsliding. Erasmus Law Review. 17(1). 50–62. 1 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper, et al.. (2023). The role of fundamental rights in the environmental case law of the CJEU. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(3). 616–635. 2 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2023). EU Accession to the ECHR: Completing the Complete System of EU Remedies?. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2023). Between interpretation and application: case-specific CJEU judgments in the preliminary ruling procedure. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 6(3). 1–33. 1 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper, et al.. (2021). Black box in Luxembourg. The bewildering experience of national judges and lawyers in the context of the preliminary reference procedure. European Law Review. 46(1). 61–80. 2 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2020). Irish Courts and the European Court of Justice: Explaining the Surprising Move from an Island Mentality to Enthusiastic Engagement. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2020). Less is more: Proposals for how UN human rights treaty bodies can be more selective. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 38(1). 5–11. 4 indexed citations

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2018). De lagere rechter aan banden. Is er nog ruimte voor de lagere rechter om te verwijzen naar het HvJ. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2018. 183–196. 2 indexed citations

10.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2018). Luxemburg heeft gesproken; wat nu? De antwoorden van het HvJ door de ogen van de hoogste Nederlandse bestuursrechters. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 2018. 57–65. 1 indexed citations

11.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2017). De hoogste Nederlandse bestuursrechters en het Hof van Justitie. Geboren danspartners? Het hoe en waarom van verwijzen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2017. 305–315. 1 indexed citations

12.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2016). 'Open Sesame!': Improving Access to the ECJ by Obliging National Courts to Reason Their Refusals to Refer. European Law Review. 42(1). 46–62. 2 indexed citations

13.

Krommendijk, Jasper, et al.. (2016). From Opinion 2/13 to Avotiņš: Recent Developments in the Relationship between the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Courts. Human Rights Law Review. 14 indexed citations

14.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2015). The Use of ECTHR Case Law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: The View of Luxembourg Insiders. SSRN Electronic Journal.

15.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2015). The Use of ECtHR Case Law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 22(6). 812–835. 5 indexed citations

16.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2015). The (In)effectiveness of UN Human Rights Treaty Body Recommendations. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 33(2). 194–223. 6 indexed citations

17.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2015). The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies. The case of the UN human rights treaty bodies. The Review of International Organizations. 10(4). 489–512. 34 indexed citations

18.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2012). The (Non) Implementation of Recommendations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in the Netherlands Explained. Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 13(4). 462–479. 2 indexed citations

19.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2011). The Impact and Effectiveness of Non-Judicial Mechanisms for the Implementation of Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal.

20.

Krommendijk, Jasper. (2010). The Impact and Effectiveness of State Reporting Under the Women’s Convention: The Case of the Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal. 487–512.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact