Janine Prick

402 citations
13 papers · 260 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Hematology top 10%
    • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
    • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment

Papers in

Janine Prick

12 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Janine Prick
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Hematology 81
  • Genetics 24
  • Oncology 58
  • Cancer Research 26
  • Immunology 26
Replace Britt‐Marie Frost with:
Britt‐Marie Frost Sweden
Caigang Xu China
Federica Cocito Italy
Parveen Shiraz United States
P. Talley United Kingdom
Alessandra Pompa Italy
Dorte Tholstrup Denmark
H. Goldschmidt Germany
Stefanie Jilg Germany
Zoé Van de Wyngaert France
Janine Prick relative to Britt‐Marie Frost Sweden Britt‐Marie Frost's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Britt‐Marie Frost · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janine Prick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Prick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Prick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Prick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Prick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Prick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Prick. The network helps show where Janine Prick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janine Prick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janine Prick Line = papers co-authored together Janine Prick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201862
2 202057
3 201533
4 201823
5 201420
6 202214
7 202212
8 202212
9 202111
10 202211
11 20253
12 20242
13 20250

About Janine Prick

Janine Prick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Hematology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Kruppel-like factors research (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (81 citations), Genetics (24 citations), Oncology (58 citations), Cancer Research (26 citations) and Immunology (26 citations). Janine Prick has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David G. Kent, Anthony R. Green, Berthold Göttgens, Renske M. van den Berg‐Vos, Nicola K. Wilson, Sander M. Van Schaik, Cornelia F. van Uden‐Kraan, Reiner Schulte, Chiara Cossetti and Gerald de Haan. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Hematology, Patient Education and Counseling, European Journal of Cancer, BMJ Open and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact