Janine Barbot

476 total citations
21 papers, 247 citations indexed

About

Janine Barbot is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Janine Barbot has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 247 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Janine Barbot's work include Historical and Scientific Studies (11 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (8 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers). Janine Barbot is often cited by papers focused on Historical and Scientific Studies (11 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (8 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers). Janine Barbot collaborates with scholars based in France, Mali and United Kingdom. Janine Barbot's co-authors include Nicolas Dodier, Isabelle Parizot, Myriam Winance, Camille Le Ray, Patrick Maison, Jean Paul Vernant, Vololona Rabeharisoa, Victoria Rollason, Joël Ankri and Dominique Bertrand and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Sociology of Health & Illness.

In The Last Decade

Janine Barbot

20 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janine Barbot France 8 115 94 32 21 21 21 247
Lavanya Vijayasingham Malaysia 9 78 0.7× 37 0.4× 58 1.8× 22 1.0× 46 2.2× 23 274
Karen Middleton United Kingdom 11 35 0.3× 65 0.7× 8 0.3× 31 1.5× 21 1.0× 18 338
Ryan Maier Canada 7 123 1.1× 103 1.1× 3 0.1× 13 0.6× 27 1.3× 19 285
Kalle Grill Sweden 10 57 0.5× 36 0.4× 4 0.1× 11 0.5× 47 2.2× 25 230
Katherine Brown United States 8 55 0.5× 34 0.4× 41 1.3× 30 1.4× 55 2.6× 25 291
Hugues Lagrange France 12 74 0.6× 251 2.7× 22 0.7× 36 1.7× 16 0.8× 50 334
Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz France 11 185 1.6× 78 0.8× 9 0.3× 25 1.2× 111 5.3× 45 330
Sulamis Dain Brazil 10 180 1.6× 112 1.2× 5 0.2× 7 0.3× 42 2.0× 23 320
Jordan M. Neil United States 11 67 0.6× 61 0.6× 4 0.1× 18 0.9× 34 1.6× 44 302
Silja Samerski Germany 8 118 1.0× 67 0.7× 3 0.1× 34 1.6× 16 0.8× 16 249

Countries citing papers authored by Janine Barbot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Barbot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Barbot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Barbot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Barbot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Barbot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Barbot. The network helps show where Janine Barbot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janine Barbot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janine Barbot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janine Barbot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janine Barbot. Janine Barbot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barbot, Janine, et al.. (2024). Evolution of Episiotomy Incidence and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Over 10 Years: A Mixed‐Methods Study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 132(4). 454–463.
2.
Bertrand, Dominique, Marie‐Christine Jaulent, Vololona Rabeharisoa, et al.. (2023). Patient and public involvement in the benefit–risk assessment and decision concerning health products: position of the Scientific Advisory Board of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). BMJ Global Health. 8(5). e011966–e011966. 2 indexed citations
3.
Barbot, Janine. (2018). Aux frontières de l’irresponsabilité médicale. Les médecins en procès au début du xixe siècle. Sciences sociales et santé. 36(4). 65–65. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dodier, Nicolas & Janine Barbot. (2017). A força dos dispositivos. Sociedade e Estado. 32(2). 487–518. 8 indexed citations
5.
Winance, Myriam, Janine Barbot, & Isabelle Parizot. (2017). From loss to repair. A study of body narratives in patient claims for medical injury. Sociology of Health & Illness. 40(1). 53–66. 1 indexed citations
6.
Dodier, Nicolas & Janine Barbot. (2016). La force des dispositifs. Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales. 71(2). 421–448. 46 indexed citations
7.
Dodier, Nicolas & Janine Barbot. (2016). The Force of Dispositifs. 71(2). 291–317. 4 indexed citations
8.
Barbot, Janine, Myriam Winance, & Isabelle Parizot. (2015). Imputer, reprocher, demander réparation. une sociologie de la plainte en matière médicale. Sciences sociales et santé. 33(2). 77–105. 6 indexed citations
9.
Barbot, Janine & Nicolas Dodier. (2015). Dealing with Compassion at Work. Strategic Reflexivity among Court Lawyers. Sociologie du Travail. 57. e43–e62. 2 indexed citations
10.
Barbot, Janine, Myriam Winance, & Isabelle Parizot. (2015). Imputer, reprocher, demander réparation. Une sociologie de la plainte en matière médicale. Sciences sociales et santé. 33(2). 77–77. 5 indexed citations
11.
Barbot, Janine & Nicolas Dodier. (2014). Victims’ Normative Repertoire of Financial Compensation: The Tainted hGH Case. Human Studies. 38(1). 81–96. 7 indexed citations
12.
Barbot, Janine, Isabelle Parizot, & Myriam Winance. (2013). “No-fault” compensation for victims of medical injuries. Ten years of implementing the French model. Health Policy. 114(2-3). 236–245. 17 indexed citations
13.
Barbot, Janine, et al.. (2010). Figures de victimes et réparation des violences faites aux corps : Quand la chirurgie esthétique se donne à voir. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1 indexed citations
14.
Dodier, Nicolas & Janine Barbot. (2008). Autonomy and Objectivity as Political Operators in the Medical World: Twenty Years of Public Controversy about AIDS Treatments in France. Science in Context. 21(3). 403–434. 15 indexed citations
15.
Barbot, Janine, et al.. (2008). La dynamique des victimes. Les formes d’engagement associatif face aux contaminations iatrogènes (VIH et prion). Sociologie et sociétés. 39(1). 217–247. 13 indexed citations
16.
Barbot, Janine, et al.. (2006). «Defensive medicine»: critique of a successful concept. Sciences sociales et santé. 24(2). 5–34. 1 indexed citations
17.
Barbot, Janine, et al.. (2006). La « médecine défensive » : critique d'un concept à succès. Sciences sociales et santé. 24(2). 5–5. 2 indexed citations
18.
Barbot, Janine. (2005). How to build an “active” patient? The work of AIDS associations in France. Social Science & Medicine. 62(3). 538–551. 81 indexed citations
19.
Barbot, Janine & Nicolas Dodier. (2002). Multiplicity in Scientific Medicine: The Experience of HIV-Positive Patients. Science Technology & Human Values. 27(3). 404–440. 25 indexed citations
20.
Barbot, Janine. (1998). [Acting on clinical trials. Experience of organizations for the fight against AIDS].. PubMed. 46(4). 305–15. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026