Janina Pfaff
About
In The Last Decade
Janina Pfaff
7 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Molecular Biology 311
- Cancer Research 150
- Plant Science 41
- Spectroscopy 22
- Biomedical Engineering 20
Countries citing papers authored by Janina Pfaff
This map shows the geographic impact of Janina Pfaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janina Pfaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janina Pfaff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janina Pfaff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janina Pfaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janina Pfaff. The network helps show where Janina Pfaff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janina Pfaff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janina Pfaff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janina Pfaff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janina Pfaff. Janina Pfaff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 78 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 30 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.