Janice D. Walker

1.4k total citations
18 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Janice D. Walker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice D. Walker has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 4 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Janice D. Walker's work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers). Janice D. Walker is often cited by papers focused on Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers). Janice D. Walker collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janice D. Walker's co-authors include Paul D. Cleary, Susan Edgman‐Levitan, Thomas L. Delbanco, William McMullen, Thomas W. Moloney, Marc J. Roberts, Ira B. Wilson, J. Lee Hargraves, Alan M. Zaslavsky and Cara James and has published in prestigious journals such as Diabetes Care, Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Janice D. Walker

17 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janice D. Walker United States	14	845	242	226	205	168	18	1.1k
Dale Shaller United States	17	1.1k 1.3×	339 1.4×	185 0.8×	196 1.0×	86 0.5×	40	1.4k
Marjorie M. Godfrey United States	20	996 1.2×	323 1.3×	149 0.7×	306 1.5×	253 1.5×	32	1.6k
Øyvind Andresen Bjertnæs Norway	20	984 1.2×	193 0.8×	240 1.1×	112 0.5×	75 0.4×	87	1.3k
Denise D. Quigley United States	18	1.1k 1.3×	291 1.2×	169 0.7×	431 2.1×	287 1.7×	109	1.6k
Laura A. Giordano United States	13	1.1k 1.3×	501 2.1×	175 0.8×	154 0.8×	87 0.5×	22	1.3k
Maulik Joshi United States	15	453 0.5×	236 1.0×	121 0.5×	117 0.6×	322 1.9×	30	994
Julie J. Mohr United States	20	836 1.0×	298 1.2×	99 0.4×	336 1.6×	317 1.9×	32	1.6k
Maureen Bisognano United States	12	617 0.7×	361 1.5×	68 0.3×	167 0.8×	150 0.9×	31	1.0k
George A. Zangaro United States	15	1.2k 1.4×	153 0.6×	230 1.0×	247 1.2×	80 0.5×	34	1.6k
Charles M. Kilo United States	12	575 0.7×	222 0.9×	98 0.4×	172 0.8×	157 0.9×	22	983

Countries citing papers authored by Janice D. Walker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice D. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice D. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice D. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice D. Walker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice D. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice D. Walker. The network helps show where Janice D. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice D. Walker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice D. Walker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice D. Walker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice D. Walker. Janice D. Walker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Walker, Janice D., et al.. (2023). RN Compensation Program. Nursing Management. 54(6). 14–20.

White, Bobbie Ann Adair, Janice D. Walker, & Alejandro C. Arroliga. (2019). Avoiding organizational silence and creating team dialogue. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 32(3). 446–448. 8 indexed citations

Lee, Bryan S., et al.. (2017). Ophthalmology patients' interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 37(4). 420–427. 9 indexed citations

Jackson, Sara L., et al.. (2017). Patients Typing Their Own Visit Agendas Into an Electronic Medical Record: Pilot in a Safety-Net Clinic. The Annals of Family Medicine. 15(2). 158–161. 15 indexed citations

Oster, Natalia V., Sara L. Jackson, Shireesha Dhanireddy, et al.. (2014). Patient Access to Online Visit Notes. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC). 14(4). 306–312. 19 indexed citations

Feldman, Henry J., et al.. (2013). OpenNotes: Hospitalists' challenge and opportunity. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 8(7). 414–417. 25 indexed citations

Leveille, Suzanne G., Janice D. Walker, James D. Ralston, et al.. (2012). Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 12(1). 32–32. 73 indexed citations

Adler‐Milstein, Julia, Eric Pan, Janice D. Walker, et al.. (2007). The Cost of Information Technology-Enabled Diabetes Management. Disease Management. 10(3). 115–128. 16 indexed citations

Pan, Eric, Janice D. Walker, Julia Adler‐Milstein, et al.. (2007). Benefits of Information Technology–Enabled Diabetes Management. Diabetes Care. 30(5). 1137–1142. 56 indexed citations

10.

Johnston, Douglas, Eric Pan, Blackford Middleton, et al.. (2003). Center for Information Technology Leadership. 17 indexed citations

11.

Gerteis, Margaret, et al.. (2003). UNDERSTANDING THE CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE TO IMPROVE DESIGN QUALITY. 27 indexed citations

12.

Hargraves, J. Lee, Ira B. Wilson, Alan M. Zaslavsky, et al.. (2001). Adjusting for Patient Characteristics When Analyzing Reports From Patients About Hospital Care. Medical Care. 39(6). 635–641. 174 indexed citations

13.

Walker, Janice D., et al.. (2000). A comparison of carepartner and patient experiences with hospital care.. Families Systems & Health. 18(2). 191–203. 10 indexed citations

14.

Walker, Janice D., et al.. (1999). Carepartner Experiences With Hospital Care. Medical Care. 37(1). 33–38. 60 indexed citations

15.

Delbanco, Thomas L., Paul D. Cleary, Susan Edgman‐Levitan, et al.. (1995). Medical patients’ assessments of their care during hospitalization. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 10(12). 679–685. 24 indexed citations

16.

Morse, Edward V., et al.. (1995). Issues of recruitment, retention, and compliance in community-based clinical trials with traditionally underserved populations. Applied Nursing Research. 8(1). 8–14. 67 indexed citations

17.

Cleary, Paul D., Susan Edgman‐Levitan, Janice D. Walker, Margaret Gerteis, & Thomas L. Delbanco. (1993). Using patient reports to improve medical care. Quality Management in Health Care. 2(1). 31–38. 70 indexed citations

18.

Cleary, Paul D., Susan Edgman‐Levitan, Marc J. Roberts, et al.. (1991). Patients Evaluate Their Hospital Care: A National Survey. Health Affairs. 10(4). 254–267. 479 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact