Janet S. Smith

741 total citations
11 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Janet S. Smith is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet S. Smith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Gender Studies, 4 papers in Language and Linguistics and 3 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Janet S. Smith's work include Gender Studies in Language (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers). Janet S. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Gender Studies in Language (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers). Janet S. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet S. Smith's co-authors include Shigeko Okamoto and has published in prestigious journals such as American Anthropologist, Language in Society and Journal of Sociolinguistics.

In The Last Decade

Janet S. Smith

9 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet S. Smith United States	7	243	135	120	89	81	11	346
José Luis ́Blas Arroyo Spain	10	369 1.5×	99 0.7×	302 2.5×	41 0.5×	86 1.1×	94	451
Bárbara De Cock Belgium	10	201 0.8×	121 0.9×	74 0.6×	24 0.3×	64 0.8×	49	320
Marta Albelda Marco Spain	13	350 1.4×	110 0.8×	130 1.1×	15 0.2×	122 1.5×	51	420
Haruko Minegishi Cook United States	12	421 1.7×	260 1.9×	178 1.5×	41 0.5×	129 1.6×	23	460
Katie Wales United Kingdom	11	165 0.7×	102 0.8×	85 0.7×	27 0.3×	99 1.2×	26	296
Holly R. Cashman United States	7	161 0.7×	99 0.7×	143 1.2×	26 0.3×	26 0.3×	25	247
Gisle Andersen Norway	10	514 2.1×	170 1.3×	274 2.3×	56 0.6×	101 1.2×	29	596
Klaus J. Mattheier Poland	6	215 0.9×	43 0.3×	216 1.8×	33 0.4×	69 0.9×	25	333
Peter Siemund Germany	13	357 1.5×	81 0.6×	264 2.2×	28 0.3×	78 1.0×	46	463
Mireia Trenchs Parera Spain	9	131 0.5×	146 1.1×	170 1.4×	66 0.7×	21 0.3×	28	294

Countries citing papers authored by Janet S. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet S. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet S. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet S. Smith. The network helps show where Janet S. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet S. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet S. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet S. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet S. Smith. Janet S. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Smith, Janet S., et al.. (2009). The green leaves of love: Japanese romantic heroines, authentic femininity, and dialect¹. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 13(4). 524–546. 19 indexed citations

2.

Okamoto, Shigeko & Janet S. Smith. (2008). Constructing Linguistic Femininity in Contemporary Japan. Gender and Language. 2(1). 87–112. 21 indexed citations

3.

Smith, Janet S., et al.. (2004). Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 54 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Janet S.. (2000). Under the Shadow of Nationalism: Politics and Poetics of Rural Japanese Women. American Anthropologist. 102(1). 208–209.

5.

Smith, Janet S.. (1999). From Hiren to Happî-endo. 131.

6.

Smith, Janet S.. (1997). Joy Hendry, Wrapping culture: Politeness, presentation and power in Japan and other societies. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993. Pp. xiv, 200.. Language in Society. 26(2). 312–317. 1 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Janet S., et al.. (1996). Variability in Written Japanese: Towards a Sociolinguistics of Script Choice.. Visible Language. 30(1). 46–71. 25 indexed citations

8.

Smith, Janet S.. (1994). Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 4(1). 92–94. 145 indexed citations

9.

Smith, Janet S.. (1992). Women in charge: Politeness and directives in the speech of Japanese women. Language in Society. 21(1). 59–82. 51 indexed citations

10.

Smith, Janet S.. (1992). The Giving of Evidence: A Study of Sentence Extensions and Gender in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics. 14(1). 67–90. 2 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Janet S., et al.. (1990). Womansword: What Japanese Words Say about Women. The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese. 24(1). 128–128. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact