Janet R. Manning
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael W. StonerIain ScottDharendra ThapaManling ZhangBingxian XieMichael J. JurczakSruti ShivaDanielle A. Guimarães
- Topics
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (14 papers)Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (9 papers)Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCirculation Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janet R. Manning
29 papers receiving 527 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Molecular Biology 372
- Physiology 212
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
- Epidemiology 87
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Janet R. Manning
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet R. Manning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet R. Manning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet R. Manning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet R. Manning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet R. Manning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet R. Manning. The network helps show where Janet R. Manning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet R. Manning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet R. Manning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet R. Manning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet R. Manning. Janet R. Manning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Janet R. Manning
Janet R. Manning is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Physiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (14 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (9 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (69 citations), Physiology (212 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations). Janet R. Manning has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Stoner, Iain Scott, Dharendra Thapa, Manling Zhang, Bingxian Xie, Michael J. Jurczak, Sruti Shiva, Danielle A. Guimarães, Robert M. O’Doherty and Lia R. Edmunds. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Circulation Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.