janet M. Lang

2.7k total citations
41 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

janet M. Lang is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, janet M. Lang has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in janet M. Lang's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers) janet M. Lang is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers) janet M. Lang collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa janet M. Lang's co-authors include Ellice Lieberman, Amy Cohen, Fredric D. Frigoletto, Douglas K. Richardson, Charles H. Hennekens, Steven A. Ringer, Jeffrey L. Ecker, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Lisa Berkman and Denis A. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, PEDIATRICS and American Journal of Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

janet M. Lang

39 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
janet M. Lang United States 18 507 441 439 320 248 41 1.6k
Richard Dobbie United Kingdom 21 1.3k 2.5× 430 1.0× 1.1k 2.4× 228 0.7× 266 1.1× 33 2.0k
B Haglund Sweden 22 812 1.6× 465 1.1× 485 1.1× 220 0.7× 215 0.9× 37 2.4k
Michael S. Kramer Canada 17 1.3k 2.5× 354 0.8× 763 1.7× 534 1.7× 538 2.2× 18 2.0k
Paul Rheeder South Africa 24 159 0.3× 163 0.4× 311 0.7× 515 1.6× 141 0.6× 120 2.0k
Sohail Mulla Canada 18 849 1.7× 438 1.0× 564 1.3× 198 0.6× 127 0.5× 27 1.9k
Haiyan Gao China 14 195 0.4× 358 0.8× 236 0.5× 420 1.3× 69 0.3× 35 1.4k
Cheryl Levitt Canada 23 301 0.6× 567 1.3× 280 0.6× 313 1.0× 146 0.6× 65 1.7k
Susan McDonald Australia 23 1.4k 2.7× 517 1.2× 965 2.2× 262 0.8× 528 2.1× 62 2.2k
Julián Librero Spain 19 205 0.4× 163 0.4× 194 0.4× 328 1.0× 96 0.4× 107 1.6k
Peter Ihle Germany 20 168 0.3× 364 0.8× 101 0.2× 380 1.2× 238 1.0× 105 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by janet M. Lang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of janet M. Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by janet M. Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites janet M. Lang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by janet M. Lang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by janet M. Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by janet M. Lang. The network helps show where janet M. Lang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of janet M. Lang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of janet M. Lang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of janet M. Lang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with janet M. Lang. janet M. Lang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pandya, Pranav, et al.. (2022). The diagnosis and management of fetal cardiac arrhythmias. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 24(2). 119–130. 1 indexed citations
2.
Blight, James G., et al.. (2012). Becoming Enemies. 3 indexed citations
3.
Maskey, Mahesh, et al.. (2011). Field test results of the motherhood method to measure maternal mortality.. PubMed. 133. 64–9. 8 indexed citations
4.
Nguyen, Uyen‐Sa, Kenneth J. Rothman, Serkalem Demissie, et al.. (2009). Epidural Analgesia and Risks of Cesarean and Operative Vaginal Deliveries in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 14(5). 705–712. 34 indexed citations
5.
Nguyen, Uyen‐Sa, Kenneth J. Rothman, Serkalem Demissie, et al.. (2009). Transfers Among Women Intending A Birth Center Delivery in the San Diego Birth Center Study. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 54(2). 104–110. 6 indexed citations
6.
Yood, Marianne Ulcickas, Ulka B. Campbell, Kenneth J. Rothman, et al.. (2007). Using prescription claims data for drugs available over‐the‐counter (OTC). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 16(9). 961–968. 82 indexed citations
7.
Blight, James G. & janet M. Lang. (2004). Lesson number one: "Empathize with your enemy.". Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 10(4). 349–368. 8 indexed citations
8.
Jackson, Debra, janet M. Lang, Jeffrey L. Ecker, W. H. Swartz, & Timothy Heeren. (2003). Impact of Collaborative Management and Early Admission in Labor on Method of Delivery. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 32(2). 147–157. 55 indexed citations
9.
Cann, Cristina I. & janet M. Lang. (2002). Many Thanks to Ken Rothman. Epidemiology. 13(5). 604–604. 2 indexed citations
10.
Goetzl, Laura, Amy Cohen, Fredric D. Frigoletto, et al.. (2001). Maternal Epidural Use and Neonatal Sepsis Evaluation in Afebrile Mothers. PEDIATRICS. 108(5). 1099–1102. 29 indexed citations
11.
Paine, Lisa L., Timothy R.B. Johnson, janet M. Lang, et al.. (2000). A Comparison Of Visits And Practices Of Nurse‐Midwives And Obstetrician‐Gynecologists In Ambulatory Care Settings. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 45(1). 37–44. 21 indexed citations
12.
Swartz, W. H., Debra Jackson, janet M. Lang, et al.. (1998). The BirthPlace collaborative practice model: results from the San Diego Birth Center Study. Primary Care Update for OB/GYNS. 5(4). 207–207. 9 indexed citations
13.
Lieberman, Ellice, et al.. (1997). The association of fetal sex with the rate of cesarean section. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 176(3). 667–671. 79 indexed citations
14.
Lang, janet M., Ellice Lieberman, & Amy Cohen. (1996). A Comparison of Risk Factors for Preterm Labor and Term Small-for-Gestational-Age Birth. Epidemiology. 7(4). 369–376. 159 indexed citations
15.
Frigoletto, Fredric D., Ellice Lieberman, janet M. Lang, et al.. (1996). A Clinical Trial of Active Management of Labor. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 51(3). 154–155. 6 indexed citations
16.
Lang, janet M., Julie E. Buring, Bernard Rosner, Nancy R. Cook, & Charles H. Hennekens. (1991). Estimating the effect of the run‐in on the power of the physicians' health study. Statistics in Medicine. 10(10). 1585–1593. 61 indexed citations
17.
LaCroix, Andrea Z., janet M. Lang, Paul A. Scherr, et al.. (1991). Smoking and Mortality among Older Men and Women in Three Communities. New England Journal of Medicine. 324(23). 1619–1625. 291 indexed citations
18.
Lang, janet M., Ellice Lieberman, Kenneth J. Ryan, & Richard R. Monson. (1990). INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL AND RISK OF PRETERM LABOR. American Journal of Epidemiology. 132(2). 304–309. 43 indexed citations
19.
Lang, janet M.. (1990). The use of a run‐in to enhance compliance. Statistics in Medicine. 9(1-2). 87–95. 43 indexed citations
20.
Lang, janet M.. (1986). The use of a run-in before randomization. Controlled Clinical Trials. 7(3). 242–242. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026