Janet L. Hiebert
- Law top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (15 papers)Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers)Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Political ScienceCanadian Public PolicyCanadian Journal of Political Science
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janet L. Hiebert
22 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Law 145
- Political Science and International Relations 108
- Sociology and Political Science 88
- Economics and Econometrics 27
- Strategy and Management 12
Countries citing papers authored by Janet L. Hiebert
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet L. Hiebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet L. Hiebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet L. Hiebert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet L. Hiebert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet L. Hiebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet L. Hiebert. The network helps show where Janet L. Hiebert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet L. Hiebert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet L. Hiebert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet L. Hiebert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet L. Hiebert. Janet L. Hiebert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Governing Under the Human Rights Act: The Limitations of Wishful Thinking | 6 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Rights-vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes | 4 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights? | 15 |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Janet L. Hiebert
Janet L. Hiebert is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 206 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (15 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (10 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (145 citations), Political Science and International Relations (108 citations) and Public Administration (10 citations). Janet L. Hiebert has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James B. Kelly, Douglas M. Brown, J. Scott Matthews and Elizabeth Goodyear‐Grant. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Canadian Public Policy and Canadian Journal of Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.