This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Haig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Haig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Haig more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Haig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Haig. The network helps show where Janet Haig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Haig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Haig.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Haig based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Haig. Janet Haig is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hockings, Marc, et al.. (2004). Fraser Island World Heritage Area: Review of outstanding universal value. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 43. 60–1.2 indexed citations
2.
Hockings, Marc, et al.. (2004). Cooloola : Assessment of potential outstanding universal value. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).1 indexed citations
3.
McLaughlin, Patsy A. & Janet Haig. (1995). A redescription of Diogenes senex Heller, 1865, sensu stricto (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguridea: Diogenidae). AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization).1 indexed citations
4.
Haig, Janet. (1989). Porcellanidae (Decapoda, Anomura) collected during MUSORSTOM 1 and 2.4 indexed citations
Haig, Janet, et al.. (1975). First Records and Range Extensions of Crabs in California Waters. Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College).5 indexed citations
10.
Haig, Janet. (1974). Observations on the Lithodid Crabs of Peru, with Description of Two New Species. Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College). 73(3). 152–164.13 indexed citations
11.
Ball, Eldon E. & Janet Haig. (1974). Hermit Crabs from the Tropical Eastern Pacific. I. Distribution, Color, and Natural History of Some Common Shallow-Water Species. Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College). 73(2). 95–104.28 indexed citations
12.
McLaughlin, Patsy A. & Janet Haig. (1973). The Status of Pagurus mertensii Brandt, with Descriptions of a New Genus and Two New Species from California (Crustacea: Decapoda: Paguridae). Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College). 72(3). 113–136.11 indexed citations
13.
Brusca, Richard C. & Janet Haig. (1972). Range Extensions of Porcelain and Hermit Crabs in the Gulf of California. Occidental College Scholar (Occidental College). 71(1). 56–56.2 indexed citations
Haig, Janet. (1965). Sur une collection de crustacés porcellanes ( Anomura : Porcellanidae ) de Madagascar et des Comores. 3(4). 39–50.3 indexed citations
18.
Haig, Janet. (1957). Four New Porcellain Crabs from the Eastern Pacific. Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences. 56(1). 31–41.5 indexed citations
19.
Haig, Janet, et al.. (1957). The Porcellanid Crabs of the Askoy Expedition to the Panama Bight. American Museum Novitates. 1865. 1–17.4 indexed citations
20.
Haig, Janet. (1956). NOTES ON TWO ANOMURAN CRUSTACEANS NEW TO CALIFORNIA WATERS1. Bulletin Southern California Academy of Sciences. 55(2). 79–82.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.