Janet E. Forrest

507 total citations
21 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

Janet E. Forrest is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet E. Forrest has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Spectroscopy, 5 papers in Organic Chemistry and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Janet E. Forrest's work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (5 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers). Janet E. Forrest is often cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (5 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers). Janet E. Forrest collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Janet E. Forrest's co-authors include R. A. Heacock, T. P. Forrest, Michael J. Martin, O. Hutzinger, David J. Roberts and David Roberts and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Journal of Small Business Management.

In The Last Decade

Janet E. Forrest

18 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet E. Forrest Canada	8	204	71	64	52	38	21	368
Yuqian Han China	10	143 0.7×	27 0.4×	19 0.3×	67 1.3×	16 0.4×	28	381
Jeffrey A. Stamp United States	4	33 0.2×	175 2.5×	17 0.3×	25 0.5×	13 0.3×	5	320
F. R. Bradbury United Kingdom	11	94 0.5×	19 0.3×	168 2.6×	77 1.5×	6 0.2×	26	507
Vijay Kumar Gupta India	12	255 1.3×	10 0.1×	51 0.8×	31 0.6×	43 1.1×	36	565
Muhammad Jawad Iqbal Pakistan	8	93 0.5×	38 0.5×	16 0.3×	66 1.3×	8 0.2×	10	461
Zheng Zhao United States	9	387 1.9×	75 1.1×	69 1.1×	10 0.2×	42 1.1×	22	557
Nguyễn Hữu Khôi Vietnam	15	42 0.2×	15 0.2×	29 0.5×	74 1.4×	10 0.3×	34	607
Elisabeth Baier Germany	6	50 0.2×	18 0.3×	42 0.7×	33 0.6×	8 0.2×	14	274
Athula Ekanayake Sri Lanka	9	93 0.5×	8 0.1×	23 0.4×	44 0.8×	12 0.3×	24	317
Paul J. Davis Kazakhstan	11	59 0.3×	44 0.6×	35 0.5×	15 0.3×	19 0.5×	28	286

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Forrest

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Forrest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Forrest

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Forrest. The network helps show where Janet E. Forrest may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet E. Forrest

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet E. Forrest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet E. Forrest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet E. Forrest. Janet E. Forrest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Forrest, Janet E.. (1996). Japanese/U.S. technological competitiveness and strategic alliances in the biotechnology industry. R and D Management. 26(2). 141–154. 6 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E., et al.. (1992). Strategic Alliances between Large and Small Research Intensive Organizations: Experiences in the Biotechnology Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E.. (1992). Management Aspects of Strategic Partnering. Journal of General Management. 17(4). 25–40. 29 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E., et al.. (1992). Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organizations: experiences in the biotechnology industry. R and D Management. 22(1). 41–54. 115 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E.. (1990). Strategic Alliances and the Small Technology-Based Firm. Journal of Small Business Management. 28(3). 37. 96 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E. & Michael J. Martin. (1990). Strategic Alliances: Lessons from the New Biotechnology Industry. Engineering Management Journal. 2(1). 13–22. 12 indexed citations

Forrest, Janet E.. (1989). MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS OF NEW-TECHNOLOGY BASED FIRMS: THE CASE OF THE NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 7(1). 58–67.

Forrest, Janet E., R. A. Heacock, & T. P. Forrest. (1975). ChemInform Abstract: CLEAVAGE OF THE METHYLENDIOXY RING IN THE GRIGNARD REACTION OF 3,4‐METHYLENDIOXYBENZONITRILE. Chemischer Informationsdienst. 6(7).

Forrest, Janet E., R. A. Heacock, & T. P. Forrest. (1974). Cleavage of the Methylenedioxy Ring in the Grignard Reaction of 3,4-Methylenedioxybenzonitrile. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 52(22). 3784–3786. 2 indexed citations

10.

Forrest, Janet E. & R. A. Heacock. (1974). A chromatographic comparison of the constituents of nutmeg and mace (Myristica fragrans Houtt.) with those of marihuana and hashish (Cannabis Sativa L.). Journal of Chromatography A. 89(1). 113–117. 13 indexed citations

11.

Forrest, Janet E., R. A. Heacock, & T. P. Forrest. (1974). Diarylpropanoids from nutmeg and mace (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1. 2. 205–205. 38 indexed citations

12.

Heacock, R. A. & Janet E. Forrest. (1973). The use of electron-acceptor reagents for the detection of some hallucinogens. Journal of Chromatography A. 78(1). 241–250. 4 indexed citations

13.

Forrest, Janet E. & R. A. Heacock. (1973). The use of electron-acceptor reagents for the non-destructive detection of some phenothiazine derivatives on thin layers. Journal of Chromatography A. 75(1). 156–160. 2 indexed citations

14.

Heacock, R. A., Janet E. Forrest, & O. Hutzinger. (1972). Interaction of tetracyanoethylene with indoles on silica gel and cellulose thin-layer plates. Journal of Chromatography A. 72(2). 343–350. 5 indexed citations

15.

Forrest, Janet E., R. A. Heacock, & T. P. Forrest. (1972). Identification of the major components of the essential oil of mace. Journal of Chromatography A. 69(1). 115–121. 19 indexed citations

16.

Forrest, Janet E., et al.. (1972). Colour reactions of some aromatic ethers found in essential oils. Journal of Chromatography A. 65(2). 439–444. 8 indexed citations

17.

Forrest, Janet E., et al.. (1970). Some potentially physiologically active β, β-diphenylethylamines derived from adrenaline. Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 48(12). 1850–1858. 1 indexed citations

18.

Forrest, Janet E., R. A. Heacock, David Roberts, & T. P. Forrest. (1970). The nature of some solvent-derived artifact spots observed during the chromatography of adrenaline. Journal of Chromatography A. 51. 525–533.

19.

Forrest, Janet E., David J. Roberts, & R. A. Heacock. (1969). An improved method for the preparation of adnamine. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 21(11). 786–787. 2 indexed citations

20.

Forrest, Janet E., et al.. (1969). A revised structure for the so-called "diadrenaline ether". Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 47(11). 2118–2121. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact