Janet Ceglowski

823 citations
24 papers · 426 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Ceglowski

23 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Janet Ceglowski
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 302
  • Economics and Econometrics 274
  • Strategy and Management 107
  • Development 23
  • Finance 59
Replace Byron Gangnes with:
Byron Gangnes United States
Jan Jakub Michałek Poland
Alexandre Skiba United States
Joseph Pelzman United States
Pan‐Long Tsai Taiwan
Antoine Berthou France
Nicholas Horsewood United Kingdom
Pamina Koenig France
Yasusada Murata Japan
Bo Södersten Sweden
Janet Ceglowski relative to Byron Gangnes United States Byron Gangnes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Byron Gangnes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Ceglowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Ceglowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Ceglowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Ceglowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Ceglowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Ceglowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Ceglowski. The network helps show where Janet Ceglowski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Janet Ceglowski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Ceglowski Line = papers co-authored together Janet Ceglowski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200380
2 200676
3 201244
4 200734
5 201525
6 198923
7 201119
8 199117
9 201714
10 199413
11 201012
12 200211
13 200011
14 199610
15 200910
16 19977
17 19965
18 20135
19 20063
20
The Real Yen Exchange Rate and Japanese Productivity Growth
19982

About Janet Ceglowski

Janet Ceglowski is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 24 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (18 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (16 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (6 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (3 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers) and Canadian Policy and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (302 citations), Economics and Econometrics (274 citations), Strategy and Management (107 citations), Development (23 citations) and Finance (59 citations). Janet Ceglowski has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Senegal. Frequent co-authors include Stephen S. Golub and Ahmadou Aly Mbaye. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Money and Finance, World Economy, Review of International Economics, Review of World Economics and Global economy journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact