Janet Angus

477 total citations
9 papers, 119 citations indexed

About

Janet Angus is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Angus has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 119 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Dermatology, 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Janet Angus's work include Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper) and Mast cells and histamine (1 paper). Janet Angus is often cited by papers focused on Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper) and Mast cells and histamine (1 paper). Janet Angus collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Janet Angus's co-authors include Jane Ravenscroft, David Walker, I. H. Leach, Elizabeth McDermott, Patricia M. Davidson, Sinéad Langan, John Daly, John English, Glenn Paull and Kathleen Dracup and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and European Journal of Pediatrics.

In The Last Decade

Janet Angus

9 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet Angus United Kingdom	6	25	23	22	21	18	9	119
Claudia Lomater Italy	6	23 0.9×	30 1.3×	12 0.5×	41 2.0×	8 0.4×	13	225
Hiroshi Kitazawa Japan	8	17 0.7×	50 2.2×	36 1.6×	9 0.4×	6 0.3×	23	152
Federico Simonetti Italy	8	19 0.8×	14 0.6×	7 0.3×	22 1.0×	23 1.3×	16	188
Koray Yalçın Türkiye	7	11 0.4×	41 1.8×	14 0.6×	40 1.9×	23 1.3×	29	170
Alice Mason United Kingdom	6	10 0.4×	19 0.8×	26 1.2×	32 1.5×	23 1.3×	14	145
Melanie Majure United States	7	30 1.2×	10 0.4×	7 0.3×	32 1.5×	59 3.3×	21	130
Muriel Sadlier Ireland	5	23 0.9×	136 5.9×	16 0.7×	19 0.9×	10 0.6×	17	233
Xiao Jun Huang China	6	13 0.5×	33 1.4×	6 0.3×	21 1.0×	15 0.8×	37	136
Hannah Hunter United Kingdom	7	10 0.4×	26 1.1×	18 0.8×	6 0.3×	26 1.4×	10	287
L Révol France	6	15 0.6×	16 0.7×	10 0.5×	20 1.0×	22 1.2×	55	126

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Angus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Angus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Angus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Angus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Angus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Angus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Angus. The network helps show where Janet Angus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Angus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Angus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Angus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Angus. Janet Angus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (2023). Delusional infestation: a retrospective cohort study of 49 patients over a 6-year period. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 49(2). 146–148. 1 indexed citations

2.

Roberts, Victoria, et al.. (2022). The Benefits of an Integrated Liaison Psychiatry and Dermatology Service for Complex Dermatology Patients—A Case Series. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). e159–e159. 3 indexed citations

3.

Angus, Janet. (2017). Diagnosis and management of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Prescriber. 28(5). 33–40. 3 indexed citations

4.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (2010). A novel NEMO gene mutation causing osteopetrosis, lymphoedema, hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and immunodeficiency (OL-HED-ID). European Journal of Pediatrics. 169(11). 1403–1407. 37 indexed citations

5.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (2007). Systemic mastocytosis with diffuse cutaneous involvement and haematological disease presenting in utero treated unsuccessfully with vincristine. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 0(0). 3028245726–???. 12 indexed citations

6.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (2007). Dermatitis Artefacta in a 12‐Year‐Old Girl Mimicking Cutaneous T‐cell Lymphoma. Pediatric Dermatology. 24(3). 327–329. 5 indexed citations

7.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (2006). The many faces of secondary syphilis: a re-emergence of an old disease. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 31(5). 741–745. 14 indexed citations

8.

Davidson, Patricia M., John Daly, Glenn Paull, et al.. (2003). Cardiorespiratory Nurses’ Perceptions of Palliative Care in Nonmalignant Disease: Data for the Development of Clinical Practice. American Journal of Critical Care. 12(1). 47–53. 21 indexed citations

9.

Angus, Janet, et al.. (1952). POISONING BY BARBITURATES SUCCESS OF CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT. The Lancet. 259(6708). 580–582. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact