Jane V. Fey

5.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
46 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

Jane V. Fey is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane V. Fey has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Cancer Research, 30 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 27 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Jane V. Fey's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (41 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (30 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (26 papers). Jane V. Fey is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (41 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (30 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (26 papers). Jane V. Fey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Brazil. Jane V. Fey's co-authors include Patrick I. Borgen, Hiram S. Cody, Kimberly J. Van Zee, Michael W. Kattan, Alexandra S. Heerdt, Leslie L. Montgomery, Jeanne A. Petrek, Lee K. Tan, Elisa Port and Henry Yeung and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Jane V. Fey

46 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Hit Papers

A Nomogram for Predicting the Likelihood of Additional No... 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane V. Fey United States 34 3.3k 2.6k 2.1k 1.2k 317 46 4.1k
Thomas G. Frazier United States 18 2.3k 0.7× 1.7k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 1.0k 0.9× 111 0.4× 50 3.1k
Krishna B. Clough France 35 3.1k 0.9× 1.6k 0.6× 3.3k 1.6× 1.1k 1.0× 176 0.6× 106 4.9k
Leslie L. Montgomery United States 23 2.0k 0.6× 1.5k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 861 0.7× 209 0.7× 45 2.8k
Abigail S. Caudle United States 32 2.7k 0.8× 1.9k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 1.1× 71 0.2× 107 3.5k
Claude Nos France 32 2.8k 0.9× 1.5k 0.6× 2.6k 1.2× 1.2k 1.0× 106 0.3× 95 4.0k
Parvis Gamagami Switzerland 19 2.3k 0.7× 1.9k 0.7× 917 0.4× 875 0.7× 329 1.0× 31 2.7k
Roberto Saccozzi Italy 18 6.1k 1.9× 3.6k 1.4× 2.9k 1.4× 2.7k 2.3× 499 1.6× 28 7.5k
Lorraine Tafra United States 24 1.4k 0.4× 1.0k 0.4× 851 0.4× 765 0.6× 94 0.3× 77 2.2k
Roger E. Moe United States 23 1.4k 0.4× 1.0k 0.4× 611 0.3× 1.1k 0.9× 199 0.6× 39 2.4k
Douglas W. Arthur United States 39 3.9k 1.2× 1.8k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 1.1× 58 0.2× 121 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane V. Fey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane V. Fey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane V. Fey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane V. Fey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane V. Fey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane V. Fey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane V. Fey. The network helps show where Jane V. Fey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane V. Fey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane V. Fey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane V. Fey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane V. Fey. Jane V. Fey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCarthy, Colleen M., Andrea L. Pusic, Lisa M. Sclafani, et al.. (2008). Breast Cancer Recurrence following Prosthetic, Postmastectomy Reconstruction: Incidence, Detection, and Treatment. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 121(2). 381–388. 73 indexed citations
2.
Chan, Sharon, Elisa Port, Jane V. Fey, et al.. (2008). Does the Benefit of Sentinel Node Frozen Section Vary Between Patients With Invasive Duct, Invasive Lobular, and Favorable Histologic Subtypes of Breast Cancer?. Annals of Surgery. 247(1). 143–149. 27 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Mary, Julia Park, Jane V. Fey, et al.. (2007). Perpendicular Inked Versus Tangential Shaved Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Does the Method Matter?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 204(4). 541–549. 36 indexed citations
4.
Buchanan, Claire, P.L. Dorn, Jane V. Fey, et al.. (2006). Locoregional Recurrence after Mastectomy: Incidence and Outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 203(4). 469–474. 107 indexed citations
5.
Sukumvanich, Paniti, David J. Bentrem, Hiram S. Cody, et al.. (2006). The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Paget’s Disease of the Breast. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 14(3). 1020–1023. 28 indexed citations
6.
Specht, Michelle C., Michael W. Kattan, Mithat Gönen, Jane V. Fey, & Kimberly J. Van Zee. (2005). Predicting Nonsentinel Node Status After Positive Sentinel Lymph Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Clinicians Versus Nomogram. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 12(8). 654–659. 166 indexed citations
7.
Naik, Arpana, Jane V. Fey, Mary L. Gemignani, et al.. (2004). The Risk of Axillary Relapse After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer Is Comparable With That of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. Annals of Surgery. 240(3). 462–471. 297 indexed citations
8.
King, Tari A., Jane V. Fey, Lee K. Tan, et al.. (2004). Cytokeratin‐positive cells in sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer are not random events. Cancer. 101(5). 926–933. 38 indexed citations
9.
Baron, Roberta H., Jane V. Fey, Patrick I. Borgen, & Kimberly J. Van Zee. (2004). Eighteen Sensations After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Two-Year Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. Oncology nursing forum. 31(4). 691–698. 35 indexed citations
10.
Mendez, Jane, Jane V. Fey, Hiram S. Cody, Patrick I. Borgen, & Lisa M. Sclafani. (2004). Can Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Be Omitted in Patients With Favorable Breast Cancer Histology?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 12(1). 24–28. 15 indexed citations
11.
Baron, Roberta H., Jane V. Fey, Howard T. Thaler, et al.. (2002). Eighteen Sensations After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. Oncology nursing forum. 29(4). 651–659. 58 indexed citations
12.
Montgomery, Leslie L., Alisa C. Thorne, Kimberly J. Van Zee, et al.. (2002). Isosulfan Blue Dye Reactions During Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Breast Cancer. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 95(2). 385–388. 155 indexed citations
13.
Port, Elisa, Jane V. Fey, Mary L. Gemignani, et al.. (2002). Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 195(2). 167–172. 84 indexed citations
14.
Port, Elisa, Jane V. Fey, Hiram S. Cody, & Patrick I. Borgen. (2001). Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma. Cancer. 91(2). 319–323. 5 indexed citations
15.
Port, Elisa, Jane V. Fey, Hiram S. Cody, & Patrick I. Borgen. (2001). Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma. Cancer. 91(2). 319–323. 56 indexed citations
16.
McCarter, Martin D., Henry Yeung, Samuel D. J. Yeh, et al.. (2001). Localization of the Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: Identical Results With Same-Day and Day-Before Isotope Injection. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 8(8). 682–686. 49 indexed citations
17.
Martin, Robert C.G., Anna M. Derossis, Jane V. Fey, et al.. (2001). Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. Surgery. 130(3). 432–438. 76 indexed citations
18.
Boolbol, Susan K., Jane V. Fey, Patrick I. Borgen, et al.. (2001). Intradermal Isotope Injection: A Highly Accurate Method of Lymphatic Mapping in Breast Carcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 8(1). 20–24. 79 indexed citations
19.
Klauber‐DeMore, Nancy, Lee K. Tan, Laura Liberman, et al.. (2000). Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Is It Indicated in Patients With High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ and Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ With Microinvasion?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 7(9). 636–642. 249 indexed citations
20.
Olson, John A., Jane V. Fey, Patrick I. Borgen, et al.. (2000). Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Accurately Predicts Nodal Status in T2 Breast Cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 191(6). 593–599. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026