Jane Shaw
Impact in
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
-
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Infant Development and Preterm Care
Papers in
- Surgery 2
- Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies 1
-
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 1
- Co-authors
- Anne‐Sylvie Ramelet (1 shared paper)Peter Dziewulski (1 shared paper)Richard W. Griffiths (1 shared paper)Richard Wight (1 shared paper)Dawn Carnes (1 shared paper)Colin Tysall (1 shared paper)Adrian Willis (1 shared paper)Stephanie Taylor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- CHEST Journal (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Nursing (1 paper)British Journal of Plastic Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jane Shaw
5 papers receiving 117 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 50
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 82
- Social Psychology 44
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 10
- Developmental Neuroscience 4
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Shaw. The network helps show where Jane Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jane Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 1 |
About Jane Shaw
Jane Shaw is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 5 papers that have together received 127 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (1 paper), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (1 paper), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper) and Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (50 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (82 citations), Social Psychology (44 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (10 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (4 citations). Jane Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne‐Sylvie Ramelet, Peter Dziewulski, Richard W. Griffiths, Richard Wight, Dawn Carnes, Colin Tysall, Adrian Willis, Stephanie Taylor, Andrea D Furlan and Harbinder Sandhu. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, BMJ Open, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Journal of Clinical Nursing and British Journal of Plastic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.