Jane Roth

936 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 616 citations indexed

About

Jane Roth is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Clinical Psychology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Roth has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 616 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 1 paper in Clinical Psychology and 1 paper in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jane Roth's work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper). Jane Roth is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper). Jane Roth collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Jane Roth's co-authors include Ellen J. Langer, Michael Scriven, Thomas Frazier, Ian Diamond and Francis M. Dunn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Pacific History and New Directions for Program Evaluation.

In The Last Decade

Jane Roth

9 papers receiving 528 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.

1975 531 citations Ellen J. Langer, Jane Roth Journal of Personality and Social Psychology profile →

Peers

Jane Roth

GDS

FINAN

CP

EE

ACCOU

Thomas Deckers Germany

Fabian Kosse Germany

Joe J. Gladstone United States

Jane Ebert United States

Alex Rees-Jones United States

Camilla Strömbäck Sweden

Kristian Ove R. Myrseth United Kingdom

Rebecca J. White United States

Franziska Föllmi-Heusi Germany

Kristina D. Frankenberger United States

Thomas Deckers Germany

Jane Roth

121 ×0.7

GDS

25 ×0.2

FINAN

55 ×0.4

CP

143 ×1.1

EE

65 ×0.6

ACCOU

Citations per year, relative to Jane Roth Jane Roth (= 1×) peers Thomas Deckers

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Roth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Roth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Roth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Roth. The network helps show where Jane Roth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Roth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Roth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Roth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Roth. Jane Roth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Scriven, Michael & Jane Roth. (1990). Special Feature: Needs Assessment. Evaluation Practice. 11(2). 135–140. 1 indexed citations

2.

Roth, Jane, et al.. (1990). The Fiji journals of Baron Anatole von Hügel, 1875-1877. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 7 indexed citations

3.

Roth, Jane. (1990). Needs and the needs assessment process. Evaluation Practice. 11(2). 141–143. 2 indexed citations

4.

Roth, Jane. (1990). Needs and the Needs Assessment Process. Evaluation Practice. 11(2). 141–143. 2 indexed citations

5.

Scriven, Michael & Jane Roth. (1990). Special feature: Needs assessment. Evaluation Practice. 11(2). 135–140. 6 indexed citations

6.

Frazier, Thomas, et al.. (1979). Implications of an All-Digital Navy Technical Information Presentation System.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

7.

Scriven, Michael & Jane Roth. (1978). Needs assessment: Concept and practice. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 1978(1). 1–11. 23 indexed citations

8.

Langer, Ellen J. & Jane Roth. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32(6). 951–955. 43 indexed citations

9.

Langer, Ellen J. & Jane Roth. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32(6). 951–955. 531 indexed citations breakdown →

10.

Diamond, Ian, et al.. (1967). From the archives. Journal of Pacific History. 2(1). 170–182. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact