Jane R. Stout

1.0k total citations
12 papers, 770 citations indexed

About

Jane R. Stout is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane R. Stout has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 770 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Cell Biology and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Jane R. Stout's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers). Jane R. Stout is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (8 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers) and Protist diversity and phylogeny (3 papers). Jane R. Stout collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jane R. Stout's co-authors include Annette L. Parks, Kristin M. Klueg, Marc A. T. Muskavitch, Claire Walczak, Stephanie C. Ems-McClung, Chantal LeBlanc, James Powers, Sidney L. Shaw, Melissa K. Gardner and Lesley N. Weaver and has published in prestigious journals such as Development, Current Biology and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Jane R. Stout

12 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

Jane R. Stout

MB

CB

CMN

PS

ONCOL

Wu-Min Deng United States

Leung Kim United States

Catarina Brás‐Pereira Portugal

Eurico Morais‐de‐Sá Portugal

Jill Kuglin Schweitzer United States

Fanny Jaulin‐Bastard France

Ryoko Maesaki Japan

Matthias Nowak Germany

Nancy F. Silva-Gagliardi Canada

Ikuko Hotta Japan

Wu-Min Deng United States

Jane R. Stout

545 ×0.8

MB

509 ×1.2

CB

95 ×1.3

CMN

83 ×1.5

PS

46 ×0.9

ONCOL

Citations per year, relative to Jane R. Stout Jane R. Stout (= 1×) peers Wu-Min Deng

Countries citing papers authored by Jane R. Stout

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane R. Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane R. Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane R. Stout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane R. Stout

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane R. Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane R. Stout. The network helps show where Jane R. Stout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane R. Stout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane R. Stout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane R. Stout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane R. Stout. Jane R. Stout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Smith, John, Jay Pilrose, Stephanie C. Ems-McClung, et al.. (2023). MCAK Inhibitors Induce Aneuploidy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Models. Cancers. 15(13). 3309–3309. 5 indexed citations

2.

Walczak, Claire, et al.. (2016). Spatial regulation of astral microtubule dynamics by Kif18B in PtK cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 27(20). 3021–3030. 22 indexed citations

3.

Chen, Shengyao, et al.. (2016). Transient endoreplication down-regulates the kinesin-14 HSET and contributes to genomic instability. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 27(19). 2911–2923. 26 indexed citations

4.

Huang, Rong, Hyun-Ju Oh, Jacob A. Galán, et al.. (2013). Intracellular targets for a phosphotyrosine peptidomimetic include the mitotic kinesin, MCAK. Biochemical Pharmacology. 86(5). 597–611. 3 indexed citations

5.

Stout, Jane R., et al.. (2011). Kif18B interacts with EB1 and controls astral microtubule length during mitosis. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 22(17). 3070–3080. 79 indexed citations

6.

Weaver, Lesley N., Stephanie C. Ems-McClung, Jane R. Stout, et al.. (2011). Kif18A Uses a Microtubule Binding Site in the Tail for Plus-End Localization and Spindle Length Regulation. Current Biology. 21(17). 1500–1506. 83 indexed citations

7.

Stout, Jane R., et al.. (2008). Protein Inhibition by Microinjection and RNA-Mediated Interference in Tissue Culture Cells: Complementary Approaches to Study Protein Function. Methods in molecular biology. 518. 77–97. 5 indexed citations

8.

Graham, Thomas H., Peter Wipf, Fengfeng Xu, et al.. (2008). Microtubule Binding and Disruption and Induction of Premature Senescence by Disorazole C1. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 328(3). 715–722. 32 indexed citations

9.

Stout, Jane R., et al.. (2008). Effects of anti-microtubule agents on microtubule organization in cells lacking the kinesin-13 MCAK. Cell Cycle. 7(14). 2146–2156. 28 indexed citations

10.

Stout, Jane R., et al.. (2006). Deciphering protein function during mitosis in PtK cells using RNAi. BMC Cell Biology. 7(1). 26–26. 41 indexed citations

11.

Parks, Annette L., et al.. (2006). Structure–Function Analysis of Delta Trafficking, Receptor Binding and Signaling in Drosophila. Genetics. 174(4). 1947–1961. 45 indexed citations

12.

Parks, Annette L., Kristin M. Klueg, Jane R. Stout, & Marc A. T. Muskavitch. (2000). Ligand endocytosis drives receptor dissociation and activation in the Notch pathway. Development. 127(7). 1373–1385. 401 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact