Jane R. Foster

1.5k total citations
33 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jane R. Foster is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane R. Foster has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 20 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 15 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Jane R. Foster's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (11 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers). Jane R. Foster is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (11 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers). Jane R. Foster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Jane R. Foster's co-authors include Philip A. Townsend, Anthony W. D’Amato, John B. Bradford, Robert A. Chastain, William S. Currie, Eric J. Gustafson, Andrew O. Finley, Brian R. Sturtevant, Keith N. Eshleman and David J. Mladenoff and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Remote Sensing of Environment and Water Resources Research.

In The Last Decade

Jane R. Foster

33 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane R. Foster United States 19 596 497 427 208 183 33 1.0k
Aitor Améztegui Spain 21 859 1.4× 671 1.4× 331 0.8× 308 1.5× 207 1.1× 58 1.3k
David L.R. Affleck United States 18 951 1.6× 745 1.5× 348 0.8× 190 0.9× 65 0.4× 51 1.4k
Sarah J. Hart United States 21 940 1.6× 376 0.8× 753 1.8× 345 1.7× 98 0.5× 35 1.3k
Álvaro G. Gutiérrez Chile 21 674 1.1× 736 1.5× 327 0.8× 281 1.4× 245 1.3× 34 1.4k
Franziska Schrodt United Kingdom 16 543 0.9× 537 1.1× 483 1.1× 160 0.8× 321 1.8× 37 1.3k
Raquel Benavides Spain 21 405 0.7× 504 1.0× 217 0.5× 187 0.9× 122 0.7× 43 997
Hitendra Padalia India 18 407 0.7× 414 0.8× 729 1.7× 93 0.4× 306 1.7× 65 1.2k
Don C. Bragg United States 15 869 1.5× 753 1.5× 381 0.9× 297 1.4× 50 0.3× 102 1.4k
Bijan Seyednasrollah United States 14 560 0.9× 219 0.4× 549 1.3× 227 1.1× 315 1.7× 29 995
Tanja Sanders Germany 16 507 0.9× 485 1.0× 330 0.8× 277 1.3× 53 0.3× 34 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane R. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane R. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane R. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane R. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane R. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane R. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane R. Foster. The network helps show where Jane R. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane R. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane R. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane R. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane R. Foster. Jane R. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Morelli, Toni Lyn, Michael T. Hallworth, Steven D. Faccio, et al.. (2025). Does habitat or climate change drive species range shifts?. Ecography. 2025(6). 3 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Jianmin, Elizabeth A. LaRue, Jeff W. Atkins, et al.. (2024). NEON-SD: A 30-m Structural Diversity Product Derived from the NEON Discrete-Return LiDAR Point Cloud. Scientific Data. 11(1). 1174–1174. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pastore, Melissa A., Aimée T. Classen, Anthony W. D’Amato, et al.. (2024). Frequent and strong cold‐air pooling drives temperate forest composition. Ecology and Evolution. 14(4). e11126–e11126. 3 indexed citations
4.
LaRue, Elizabeth A., Jeff W. Atkins, Jane R. Foster, et al.. (2023). Short‐term effects of moderate severity disturbances on forest canopy structure. Journal of Ecology. 111(9). 1866–1881. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gough, Christopher M., Jane R. Foster, Ben Bond‐Lamberty, & Jason Tallant. (2021). Inferring the effects of partial defoliation on the carbon cycle from forest structure: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Research Letters. 17(1). 11002–11002. 3 indexed citations
7.
Teitelbaum, Claire S., Alexej P. K. Sirén, Ethan Coffel, et al.. (2021). Habitat use as indicator of adaptive capacity to climate change. Diversity and Distributions. 27(4). 655–667. 16 indexed citations
8.
Woodall, Christopher W., James A. Westfall, Anthony W. D’Amato, Jane R. Foster, & Brian F. Walters. (2018). Decadal changes in tree range stability across forests of the eastern U.S.. Forest Ecology and Management. 429. 503–510. 18 indexed citations
9.
Lucash, Melissa S., et al.. (2018). More than the sum of its parts: how disturbance interactions shape forest dynamics under climate change. Ecosphere. 9(6). 49 indexed citations
10.
11.
Gustafson, Eric J., Nathanael I. Lichti, Douglass F. Jacobs, et al.. (2017). The implications of American chestnut reintroduction on landscape dynamics and carbon storage. Ecosphere. 8(4). 17 indexed citations
12.
Foster, Jane R. & Anthony W. D’Amato. (2015). Montane forest ecotones moved downslope in northeastern USA in spite of warming between 1984 and 2011. Global Change Biology. 21(12). 4497–4507. 70 indexed citations
13.
Foster, Jane R., Anthony W. D’Amato, & John B. Bradford. (2014). Looking for age-related growth decline in natural forests: unexpected biomass patterns from tree rings and simulated mortality. Oecologia. 175(1). 363–374. 58 indexed citations
14.
Gustafson, Eric J., Brian R. Sturtevant, Jane R. Foster, et al.. (2014). Toward more robust projections of forest landscape dynamics under novel environmental conditions: Embedding PnET within LANDIS-II. Ecological Modelling. 287. 44–57. 78 indexed citations
15.
Foster, Jane R., Philip A. Townsend, & David J. Mladenoff. (2013). Spatial dynamics of a gypsy moth defoliation outbreak and dependence on habitat characteristics. Landscape Ecology. 28(7). 1307–1320. 23 indexed citations
16.
Foster, Jane R. & Philip A. Townsend. (2004). Linking Hyperspectral Imagery and Forest Inventories for Forest Assessment in the Central Appalachians. 10 indexed citations
17.
Townsend, Philip A., Jane R. Foster, Robert A. Chastain, & William S. Currie. (2003). Application of imaging spectroscopy to mapping canopy nitrogen in the forests of the central appalachian mountains using hyperion and aviris. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 41(6). 1347–1354. 137 indexed citations
18.
Townsend, Philip A. & Jane R. Foster. (2002). A synthetic aperture radar–based model to assess historical changes in lowland floodplain hydroperiod. Water Resources Research. 38(7). 30 indexed citations
19.
Foster, Jane R., et al.. (1989). Imprinting and Homing of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Kelts. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 46(4). 714–719. 5 indexed citations
20.
Gardiner, Ross, et al.. (1986). Salmon catch decline and forestry in Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine. 102(1). 57–61. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026