Jane N. Mosier

1.2k total citations
10 papers, 240 citations indexed

About

Jane N. Mosier is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management Information Systems and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane N. Mosier has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 240 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 5 papers in Management Information Systems and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane N. Mosier's work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (5 papers) and Persona Design and Applications (2 papers). Jane N. Mosier is often cited by papers focused on Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (5 papers) and Persona Design and Applications (2 papers). Jane N. Mosier collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jane N. Mosier's co-authors include Sidney L. Smith and Nancy C. Goodwin and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour and Information Technology, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) and Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce.

In The Last Decade

Jane N. Mosier

10 papers receiving 197 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane N. Mosier United States	7	124	68	63	46	40	10	240
Thomas T. Hewett United States	9	87 0.7×	82 1.2×	42 0.7×	36 0.8×	54 1.4×	37	323
Wolfgang Dzida Germany	6	77 0.6×	61 0.9×	51 0.8×	50 1.1×	52 1.3×	17	251
Mary D. P. Leland United States	4	179 1.4×	106 1.6×	39 0.6×	70 1.5×	60 1.5×	6	301
Uta Pankoke-Babatz Germany	10	143 1.2×	48 0.7×	30 0.5×	45 1.0×	34 0.8×	21	278
Debbie Stone United Kingdom	3	105 0.8×	84 1.2×	23 0.4×	29 0.6×	32 0.8×	4	298
Alistair Sutcliffe United Kingdom	7	77 0.6×	63 0.9×	48 0.8×	34 0.7×	64 1.6×	10	269
Susanne Maaß Germany	8	125 1.0×	59 0.9×	27 0.4×	17 0.4×	49 1.2×	18	225
Jacob Somervell United States	7	202 1.6×	75 1.1×	55 0.9×	118 2.6×	24 0.6×	13	321
Brian Starr United States	8	119 1.0×	82 1.2×	32 0.5×	61 1.3×	63 1.6×	8	272
Ilona Posner Canada	6	196 1.6×	108 1.6×	63 1.0×	75 1.6×	32 0.8×	10	380

Countries citing papers authored by Jane N. Mosier

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane N. Mosier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane N. Mosier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane N. Mosier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane N. Mosier

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane N. Mosier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane N. Mosier. The network helps show where Jane N. Mosier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane N. Mosier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane N. Mosier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane N. Mosier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane N. Mosier. Jane N. Mosier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Mosier, Jane N., et al.. (1997). When Are Group Scheduling Tools Useful?. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 6(1). 53–70. 17 indexed citations

2.

Mosier, Jane N., et al.. (1997). Collaborative virtual workspace. 197–203. 43 indexed citations

3.

Mosier, Jane N., et al.. (1997). Collaborative Writing Is Hard to Support: A Field Study of Collaborative Writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 6(1). 19–51. 40 indexed citations

4.

Mosier, Jane N., et al.. (1994). Video teleconference use among geographically dispersed work groups: A field investigation of usage patterns and user preferences. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 4(4). 343–365. 4 indexed citations

5.

Mosier, Jane N. & Sidney L. Smith. (1986). Application of guidelines for designing user interface software. Behaviour and Information Technology. 5(1). 39–46. 62 indexed citations

6.

Mosier, Jane N. & Sidney L. Smith. (1985). Application of Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. 29(10). 946–949. 7 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Sidney L. & Jane N. Mosier. (1984). A Design Evaluation Checklist for User-System Interface Software. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 4 indexed citations

8.

Smith, Sidney L. & Jane N. Mosier. (1984). DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR USER-SYSTEM INTERFACE SOFTWARE. 44 indexed citations

9.

Smith, Sidney L. & Jane N. Mosier. (1984). The user interface to computer-based information systems: a survey of current software design practice. Behaviour and Information Technology. 3(3). 195–203. 18 indexed citations

10.

Mosier, Jane N.. (1984). Design and Validation of a Checklist to Aid in Choosing Word Processor Software. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. 28(2). 165–169. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact