Jane Harford

658 total citations
26 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Jane Harford is a scholar working on Periodontics, General Health Professions and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Harford has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Periodontics, 12 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Harford's work include Dental Health and Care Utilization (17 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers) and Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (6 papers). Jane Harford is often cited by papers focused on Dental Health and Care Utilization (17 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers) and Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (6 papers). Jane Harford collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Indonesia. Jane Harford's co-authors include Sergio Chrisopoulos, A. John Spencer, Marco Aurélio Peres, Liana Luzzi, Ankur Singh, Ivanka Prichard, Lisa G. Smithers, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, Adyya Gupta and Jasmine M. Petersen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Appetite and Public Health Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Jane Harford

26 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Harford Australia 14 297 144 89 79 50 26 488
Wendy Gnich United Kingdom 13 175 0.6× 212 1.5× 87 1.0× 44 0.6× 51 1.0× 24 509
Karen Sokal‐Gutierrez United States 16 261 0.9× 177 1.2× 168 1.9× 27 0.3× 36 0.7× 43 576
Jaqueline Vilela Bulgareli Brazil 12 188 0.6× 136 0.9× 51 0.6× 35 0.4× 22 0.4× 50 347
Luciane Miranda Guerra Brazil 13 161 0.5× 169 1.2× 50 0.6× 31 0.4× 23 0.5× 53 404
E J Bower United Kingdom 7 187 0.6× 187 1.3× 72 0.8× 51 0.6× 39 0.8× 15 432
Nilce Emy Tomita Brazil 15 421 1.4× 231 1.6× 108 1.2× 22 0.3× 33 0.7× 49 662
Nasruddin Jaafar Malaysia 13 361 1.2× 259 1.8× 90 1.0× 35 0.4× 103 2.1× 18 586
Tamanna Tiwari United States 17 699 2.4× 397 2.8× 178 2.0× 76 1.0× 151 3.0× 68 986
Cristina Berger Fadel Brazil 11 143 0.5× 227 1.6× 43 0.5× 23 0.3× 18 0.4× 92 379
Julia Csikar United Kingdom 14 200 0.7× 209 1.5× 60 0.7× 14 0.2× 109 2.2× 37 429

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Harford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Harford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Harford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Harford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Harford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Harford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Harford. The network helps show where Jane Harford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Harford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Harford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Harford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Harford. Jane Harford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Gupta, Adyya, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, Lisa G. Smithers, Jane Harford, & John Coveney. (2020). Good and bad sugars: Australian adults’ perspectives on sugar in their diet. Critical Public Health. 31(5). 584–594. 2 indexed citations
4.
Gupta, Adyya, Caroline Miller, Jane Harford, Lisa G. Smithers, & Annette Braunack‐Mayer. (2019). Australia’s sugar tale. Public Health Nutrition. 22(14). 2682–2687. 5 indexed citations
5.
Hariyani, Ninuk, A. John Spencer, Liana Luzzi, et al.. (2019). The prevalence and severity of root surface caries across Australian generations. Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology. 47(5). 398–406. 4 indexed citations
6.
Singh, Ankur, Jane Harford, José Leopoldo Ferreira Antunes, & Marco Aurélio Peres. (2018). Area-level income inequality and oral health among Australian adults—A population-based multilevel study. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0191438–e0191438. 15 indexed citations
7.
Gupta, Adyya, Lisa G. Smithers, Annette Braunack‐Mayer, & Jane Harford. (2018). How much free sugar do Australians consume? Findings from a national survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 42(6). 533–540. 17 indexed citations
8.
Gupta, Adyya, Lisa G. Smithers, Jane Harford, Tracy Merlin, & Annette Braunack‐Mayer. (2018). Determinants of knowledge and attitudes about sugar and the association of knowledge and attitudes with sugar intake among adults: A systematic review. Appetite. 126. 185–194. 22 indexed citations
9.
Singh, Ankur, Jane Harford, & Marco Aurélio Peres. (2018). Investigating societal determinants of oral health—Opportunities and challenges in multilevel studies. Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology. 46(4). 317–327. 9 indexed citations
10.
Wright, FAC, Benjumin Hsu, Vasi Naganathan, et al.. (2017). Oral health of community‐dwelling older Australian men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP). Australian Dental Journal. 63(1). 55–65. 15 indexed citations
11.
Singh, Ankur, Jane Harford, Helena Silveira Schuch, Richard G. Watt, & Marco Aurélio Peres. (2016). Theoretical basis and explanation for the relationship between area-level social inequalities and population oral health outcomes – A scoping review. SSM - Population Health. 2. 451–462. 24 indexed citations
12.
Singh, Ankur, Jane Harford, Richard G. Watt, & Marco Aurélio Peres. (2015). The role of theories in explaining the association between social inequalities and population oral health: a scoping review protocol. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 13(4). 30–40. 4 indexed citations
13.
Singh, Ankur, Jane Harford, Richard G. Watt, & Marco Aurélio Peres. (2015). The role of theories in explaining the association between social inequalities and population oral health: a scoping review protocol. The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 13(4). 30–40. 2 indexed citations
14.
Chrisopoulos, Sergio & Jane Harford. (2013). Oral health and dental care in Australia: key facts and figures 2012. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 49 indexed citations
15.
Harford, Jane & Liana Luzzi. (2013). Child and teenager oral health and dental visiting: results from the National Dental Telephone Interview Survey 2010.. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 21 indexed citations
16.
Harford, Jane. (2012). Productivity losses from dental problems. Australian Dental Journal. 57(3). 393–397. 14 indexed citations
17.
Harford, Jane. (2008). Population ageing and dental care. Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology. 37(2). 97–103. 60 indexed citations
18.
Harford, Jane & A. John Spencer. (2004). Government subsidies for dental care in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 28(4). 363–368. 14 indexed citations
19.
Harford, Jane, et al.. (2004). Access to dental care in Australia: Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia*. Australian Dental Journal. 49(4). 206–208. 6 indexed citations
20.
Ranzijn, Rob, Jane Harford, & Gary R. Andrews. (2002). Ageing and the economy: costs and benefits. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 21(3). 145–151. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy Gnich Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen Sokal‐Gutierrez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jaqueline Vilela Bulgareli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luciane Miranda Guerra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E J Bower Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nilce Emy Tomita Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nasruddin Jaafar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tamanna Tiwari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cristina Berger Fadel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia Csikar
Rankless by CCL
2026