Jane Dyson

29 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Jane Dyson
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Business and International Management 23
  • Geography, Planning and Development 61
  • Anthropology 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 388
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71
Replace Wendy Harcourt with:
Wendy Harcourt Netherlands
Rebecca Elmhirst United Kingdom
Susan Paulson United States
Anthony Bebbington United States
Esther Wangari United States
Ian Blore United Kingdom
Janet Townsend United Kingdom
Maristella Svampa Argentina
Scott Guggenheim United States
Sharad Chari South Africa
Jane Dyson relative to Wendy Harcourt Netherlands Wendy Harcourt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Wendy Harcourt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dyson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dyson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dyson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dyson. The network helps show where Jane Dyson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jane Dyson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Dyson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Dyson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003237
2 202098
3 201063
4 200860
5 201433
6 201331
7 201824
8 201122
9 201622
10 201921
11 201421
12 201420
13 201915
14 201814
15 201814
16 202213
17 202210
18 20219
19 20068
20
Analytical Framework for Dialogue on Common Pool Resource Management.
20027

About Jane Dyson

Jane Dyson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Soil Science and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 34 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (11 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (7 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (3 papers) and Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (23 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (61 citations), Anthropology (88 citations), Sociology and Political Science (388 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (71 citations). Jane Dyson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig Jeffrey, Dan Brockington, Bhaskar Vira, William M. Adams, Linda McDowell, Gyorgy Scrinis, Amanda Third and Steven Threadgold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Youth Studies, Geoforum, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute and Progress in Human Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact