Jane Dammen McAuliffe
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Education
- Archeology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Claude GilliotJoseph GoeringMuhammad Abdel HaleemRowan WilliamsEllen F. DavisOsman BakarDavid Marshall
- Topics
- Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers)Islamic Studies and History (9 papers)Education and Islamic Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Oriental SocietyJournal of the American Academy of ReligionStudia Islamica
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Jane Dammen McAuliffe
11 papers receiving 87 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Political Science and International Relations 60
- Religious studies 35
- Education 34
- Archeology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dammen McAuliffe
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dammen McAuliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dammen McAuliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dammen McAuliffe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dammen McAuliffe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dammen McAuliffe. The network helps show where Jane Dammen McAuliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Dammen McAuliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Dammen McAuliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Dammen McAuliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Dammen McAuliffe. Jane Dammen McAuliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | With reverence for the Word : medieval scriptural exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam | 19 |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān | 8 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 |
About Jane Dammen McAuliffe
Jane Dammen McAuliffe is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and Archeology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers), Islamic Studies and History (9 papers) and Education and Islamic Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (35 citations), Archeology (27 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (60 citations). Jane Dammen McAuliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Claude Gilliot, Joseph Goering, Muhammad Abdel Haleem, Rowan Williams, Ellen F. Davis, Osman Bakar and David Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Journal of the American Academy of Religion and Studia Islamica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.