Jane Conway

1.2k total citations
11 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Jane Conway is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Conway has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Jane Conway's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). Jane Conway is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). Jane Conway collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Netherlands. Jane Conway's co-authors include Geoffrey Bird, Caroline Catmur, Francesca Happé, Susan Petry, Gert Stulp, Thomas V. Pollet, Jennifer Murphy, Edward Millgate, Sara Pisani and Hannah Hobson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Scientific Reports and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Jane Conway

11 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Jane Conway

CN

SP

DEP

CP

ECP

Renita A. Almeida Australia

Jordi Fernández Australia

Tina M. Sutton United States

Felix Barroso United States

Kilian Garvey United States

Jonathan S. Beier United States

María Sotillo Spain

Rie Toriyama Japan

Frances Buttelmann Germany

Valtteri Arstila Finland

Renita A. Almeida Australia

Jane Conway

266 ×1.6

CN

68 ×0.6

SP

60 ×0.8

DEP

56 ×0.8

CP

44 ×0.8

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Jane Conway Jane Conway (= 1×) peers Renita A. Almeida

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Conway

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Conway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Conway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Conway more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Conway

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Conway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Conway. The network helps show where Jane Conway may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Conway

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Conway. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Conway based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Conway. Jane Conway is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Conway, Jane, et al.. (2024). Fears about artificial intelligence across 20 countries and six domains of application.. American Psychologist. 81(1). 53–67. 11 indexed citations

2.

Conway, Jane, et al.. (2022). Novel theory of mind task demonstrates representation of minds in mental state inference. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 21133–21133. 2 indexed citations

3.

Pisani, Sara, Jennifer Murphy, Jane Conway, et al.. (2021). The relationship between alexithymia and theory of mind: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 131. 497–524. 26 indexed citations

4.

Hobson, Hannah, Heather Westwood, Jane Conway, et al.. (2020). Alexithymia and autism diagnostic assessments: Evidence from twins at genetic risk of autism and adults with anorexia nervosa. Research in autism spectrum disorders. 73. 101531–101531. 20 indexed citations

5.

Conway, Jane, Caroline Catmur, & Geoffrey Bird. (2019). Understanding individual differences in theory of mind via representation of minds, not mental states. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(3). 798–812. 47 indexed citations

6.

Conway, Jane, et al.. (2019). Understanding how minds vary relates to skill in inferring mental states, personality, and intelligence.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 149(6). 1032–1047. 15 indexed citations

7.

Hobson, Hannah, Heather Westwood, Jane Conway, et al.. (2018). The impact of alexithymia on autism diagnostic assessments. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 5 indexed citations

8.

Happé, Francesca & Jane Conway. (2016). Recent progress in understanding skills and impairments in social cognition. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 28(6). 736–742. 16 indexed citations

9.

Conway, Jane, et al.. (2016). Submentalizing or mentalizing in a Level 1 perspective-taking task: A cloak and goggles test.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 43(3). 454–465. 67 indexed citations

10.

Conway, Jane, et al.. (2015). Finding your Soulmate: Homosexual and heterosexual age preferences in online dating. Personal Relationships. 22(4). 666–678. 17 indexed citations

11.

Petry, Susan, et al.. (1983). Stimulus determinants of brightness and distinctness of subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics. 34(2). 169–174. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact