Jane C.K. Fitch
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Hematology top 5%
- Immunology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christine S. RinderBruce D. SpiessScott A. RollinsHenry M. RinderBrian R. SmithSimon C. BodyAndrea NadelDavid Royston
- Topics
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (12 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers)Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane C.K. Fitch
30 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Surgery 526
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 339
- Biochemistry 238
- Hematology 235
- Immunology 227
Countries citing papers authored by Jane C.K. Fitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C.K. Fitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C.K. Fitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C.K. Fitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C.K. Fitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C.K. Fitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C.K. Fitch. The network helps show where Jane C.K. Fitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane C.K. Fitch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane C.K. Fitch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane C.K. Fitch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane C.K. Fitch. Jane C.K. Fitch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | Professional Transitions Journey From Nursing to ASA President-Elect | 1 |
| 3 | SAAA: Representing Academic Anesthesiology as One Society | 1 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 235 | |
| 9 | 81 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 181 |
About Jane C.K. Fitch
Jane C.K. Fitch is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (12 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (224 citations), Biochemistry (238 citations) and Internal Medicine (95 citations). Jane C.K. Fitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine S. Rinder, Bruce D. Spiess, Scott A. Rollins, Henry M. Rinder, Brian R. Smith, Simon C. Body, Andrea Nadel, David Royston, Wulf Dietrich and Jerrold H. Levy. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.