Jan Wunder

1.5k total citations
29 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Jan Wunder is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Wunder has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 12 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Jan Wunder's work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers). Jan Wunder is often cited by papers focused on Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers). Jan Wunder collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, New Zealand and Australia. Jan Wunder's co-authors include Harald Bugmann, Christof Bigler, Björn Reineking, Peter Brang, Jonathan Palmer, Gretel Boswijk, Anthony M. Fowler, Marco Conedera, Andrew Lorrey and Brigitte Rohner and has published in prestigious journals such as Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Journal of Ecology and Nature Climate Change.

In The Last Decade

Jan Wunder

29 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Jan Wunder

GPC

NLC

ECOLO

J. Diego Galván Spain

Kenneth R. Cabrera Colombia

Valeriy Mazepa Russia

Gabriele Carraro Switzerland

Diane L. Delany United States

Stéphanie Samartin Switzerland

Přemysl Bobek Czechia

Anton E. Oleinik United States

James A. Larsen United States

Elizabeth A. Lynch United States

J. Diego Galván Spain

Jan Wunder

477 ×1.5

GPC

320 ×1.1

NLC

566 ×2.1

26 ×0.3

94 ×1.1

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to Jan Wunder Jan Wunder (= 1×) peers J. Diego Galván

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wunder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wunder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wunder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wunder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wunder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wunder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wunder. The network helps show where Jan Wunder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Wunder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Wunder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Wunder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Wunder. Jan Wunder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Conedera, Marco, Patrik Krebs, Jan Wunder, et al.. (2021). How future-proof is Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in a global change context?. Forest Ecology and Management. 494. 119320–119320. 33 indexed citations

Portier, Jeanne, Jan Wunder, Golo Stadelmann, et al.. (2020). ‘Latent reserves’: A hidden treasure in National Forest Inventories. Journal of Ecology. 109(1). 369–383. 11 indexed citations

Conedera, Marco, et al.. (2019). Low litter cover, high light availability and rock cover favour the establishment of Ailanthus altissima in forests in southern Switzerland. NeoBiota. 46. 91–116. 5 indexed citations

Liu, Jianfeng, Marco Conedera, Holger Gärtner, et al.. (2019). Comparative dendroecological characterisation of Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle in its native and introduced range. Dendrochronologia. 57. 125608–125608. 2 indexed citations

Huber, Markus, et al.. (2019). Decay detection in Norway spruce (Picea abies) with the Rotfinder instrument. Forest Ecology and Management. 448. 549–558. 1 indexed citations

Conedera, Marco, et al.. (2018). High growth potential of Ailanthus altissima in warm and dry weather conditions in novel forests of southern Switzerland. Trees. 33(2). 395–409. 11 indexed citations

Wunder, Jan, et al.. (2018). Götterbaum und Paulownie: die «neuen Wilden» im Schweizer Wald?. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen. 169(2). 69–76. 8 indexed citations

Wunder, Jan, Sabine Braun, Brigitte Rohner, et al.. (2016). Mortalität von Waldbäumen: Ursachen und Trends. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 177–197. 1 indexed citations

Wunder, Jan, Michael P. Nobis, & Marco Conedera. (2014). Der Götterbaum - eine Gefahr für den Schweizer Wald?. DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 40–43. 1 indexed citations

10.

Boswijk, Gretel, Anthony M. Fowler, Jonathan Palmer, et al.. (2014). The late Holocene kauri chronology: assessing the potential of a 4500-year record for palaeoclimate reconstruction. Quaternary Science Reviews. 90. 128–142. 40 indexed citations

11.

Güttler, D., Florian Adolphi, J. Beer, et al.. (2014). Rapid increase in cosmogenic 14C in AD 775 measured in New Zealand kauri trees indicates short-lived increase in 14C production spanning both hemispheres. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 411. 290–297. 81 indexed citations

12.

Heiri, Caroline, et al.. (2014). Auswertung der Vollkluppierung 2012 im Naturwaldreservat Aletschwald: Aktueller Zustand und Bestandesdynamik seit 1962. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich). 15. 2 indexed citations

13.

Wunder, Jan, et al.. (2013). On the influence of tree size on the climate–growth relationship of New Zealand kauri (Agathis australis): insights from annual, monthly and daily growth patterns. Trees. 27(4). 937–948. 23 indexed citations

14.

Wunder, Jan, et al.. (2013). Does increment coring enhance tree decay? New insights from tomography assessments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 43(8). 711–718. 19 indexed citations

15.

Rohner, Brigitte, Christof Bigler, Jan Wunder, Peter Brang, & Harald Bugmann. (2012). Fifty years of natural succession in Swiss forest reserves: changes in stand structure and mortality rates of oak and beech. Journal of Vegetation Science. 23(5). 892–905. 60 indexed citations

16.

Streit, Kathrin, Jan Wunder, & Peter Brang. (2009). Slit-shaped gaps are a successful silvicultural technique to promote Picea abies regeneration in mountain forests of the Swiss Alps. Forest Ecology and Management. 257(9). 1902–1909. 26 indexed citations

17.

Wunder, Jan, Bogdan Brzeziecki, Henryk Żybura, et al.. (2008). Growth–mortality relationships as indicators of life‐history strategies: a comparison of nine tree species in unmanaged European forests. Oikos. 117(6). 815–828. 49 indexed citations

18.

Wunder, Jan, Björn Reineking, Christof Bigler, & Harald Bugmann. (2007). Predicting tree mortality from growth data: how virtual ecologists can help real ecologists. Journal of Ecology. 96(1). 174–187. 28 indexed citations

19.

Wunder, Jan, Christof Bigler, Björn Reineking, Lorenz Fahse, & Harald Bugmann. (2006). Optimisation of tree mortality models based on growth patterns. Ecological Modelling. 197(1-2). 196–206. 17 indexed citations

20.

Dolton, G.L., et al.. (1979). Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas, Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact