Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wiedenbeck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wiedenbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wiedenbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wiedenbeck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wiedenbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wiedenbeck. The network helps show where Jan Wiedenbeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Wiedenbeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Wiedenbeck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Wiedenbeck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Wiedenbeck. Jan Wiedenbeck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wang, Xiping, et al.. (2009). Acoustic tomography for decay detection in black cherry trees. Wood and Fiber Science. 41(2). 127–137.43 indexed citations
9.
Wang, Xiping, et al.. (2009). Assessing wood quality of borer-infested red oak logs with a resonance acoustic technique.. Wood and Fiber Science (Society of Wood Science and Technology). 41(2). 180–193.4 indexed citations
10.
Brinberg, David, et al.. (2008). Exploring research priorities for the North American hardwood industry. Forest Products Journal. 58(3).1 indexed citations
11.
Young, Timothy M., Brian Bond, & Jan Wiedenbeck. (2007). Implementation of a real-time statistical process control system in hardwood sawmills. Forest Products Journal. 57(9). 54–62.9 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Xiping, et al.. (2007). Acoustic assessment of stress level and potential wood quality of logs affected by oak decline.1 indexed citations
13.
Wiedenbeck, Jan, et al.. (2004). Rough-mill yield and cutting efficiency for No. 3A Common lumber compared to other lumber grade mix options. Forest Products Journal. 54(12). 132–140.3 indexed citations
14.
Wiedenbeck, Jan, et al.. (2004). Opportunities for expanded and higher value utilization of No. 3A Common hardwood lumber.. Forest Products Journal. 54(9). 77–85.2 indexed citations
15.
Wiedenbeck, Jan, et al.. (2004). Key Attributes Associated with Veneer Quality Timber that may be Impacted by Forest Management Practices.5 indexed citations
16.
Wiedenbeck, Jan, et al.. (2003). Hardwood lumber widths and grades used by the furniture and cabinet industries: Results of a 14-mill survey. Forest Products Journal. 53(4). 72–80.10 indexed citations
17.
Steele, Philip H., et al.. (1999). The influence of lumber grade on machine productivity in the rough mill. Forest Products Journal. 49(9). 48–54.3 indexed citations
18.
Wiedenbeck, Jan, et al.. (1995). Character-marked furniture: the yield picture.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 85–90.1 indexed citations
19.
Wiedenbeck, Jan & Philip A. Araman. (1993). Possible demands for eastern hardwoods resulting from harvest restrictions in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Products Journal. 43(10). 51–57.1 indexed citations
20.
Kline, D. Earl, Jan Wiedenbeck, & Philip A. Araman. (1992). Management of wood products manufacturing using simulation/animation. Forest Products Journal. 42(2). 45–52.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.