Jan Wehrheim
- Sociology and Political Science
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- General Health Professions
- Finance
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Policy (6 papers)Public Administration and Political Analysis (5 papers)German legal, social, and political studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jan Wehrheim
15 papers receiving 71 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Urban Studies 22
- Political Science and International Relations 17
- General Health Professions 14
- Finance 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wehrheim
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wehrheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wehrheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wehrheim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wehrheim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wehrheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wehrheim. The network helps show where Jan Wehrheim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Wehrheim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Wehrheim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Wehrheim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Wehrheim. Jan Wehrheim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Kritik der Versicherheitlichung: Thesen zur (sozialwissenschaftlichen) Sicherheitsforschung | 7 |
| 6 | Resozialisierung als Mittel zum Schutz der Allgemeinheit? Die programmatische Neuausrichtung der Berwährunshilfe | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Geopolicing und Kriminalitätskartierungen. Wie Polizeien sich ein Bild machen | 2 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | "Gefahrengebiete": durch die Abstraktion vom Sozialen zur Reproduktion gesellschaftlicher Strukturen | 8 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | SECURITY AND THE URBAN PUBLIC SPHERE | 6 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Exkludierende Toleranz. Ordnung und Kontrolle im Kontext akzeptierender Drogenarbeit | 1 |
| 17 | Sicherheit und urbane Öffentlichkeit. | 2 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | Kontrolle durch Abgrenzung - Gated Communities in den USA | 1 |
About Jan Wehrheim
Jan Wehrheim is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Urban Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 93 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Policy (6 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (5 papers) and German legal, social, and political studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (22 citations), Public Administration (5 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (48 citations). Jan Wehrheim has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Siebel, Bernd Belina, Norbert Gestring, Susanne Krasmann and Henning Schmidt-Semisch. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Studies, disP - The Planning Review and Berliner Journal für Soziologie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.