Jan Vervisch

798 citations
21 papers · 493 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Vervisch

21 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

Jan Vervisch
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 308
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 294
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 64
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • Pharmacy 25
Replace Ninah Koolen with:
Ninah Koolen Belgium
Kirubin Pillay United Kingdom
Anton Tokariev Finland
Anders Flisberg Sweden
Kirsi Palmu Finland
D Samson-Dollfus France
Jessica W. Templer United States
F MOUSSALLISALEFRANQUE France
Ofelie De Wel Belgium
Mario Lavanga Belgium
Jan Vervisch relative to Ninah Koolen Belgium Ninah Koolen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ninah Koolen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Vervisch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Vervisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Vervisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Vervisch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Vervisch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Vervisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Vervisch. The network helps show where Jan Vervisch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Vervisch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Vervisch Line = papers co-authored together Jan Vervisch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201791
2 201755
3 201449
4 201843
5 201534
6 200133
7 201430
8 201827
9 201627
10 201625
11 200321
12 201714
13 201611
14 20179
15 20137
16 20156
17 20105
18 20112
19 20142
20 20151

About Jan Vervisch

Jan Vervisch is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Signal Processing, having authored 21 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (15 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (6 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (308 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (294 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (64 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations) and Pharmacy (25 citations). Jan Vervisch has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Katrien Jansen, Maarten De Vos, Sabine Van Huffel, Gunnar Naulaers, A Dereymaeker, Kirubin Pillay, Ninah Koolen, Vladimir Matić, Lieven Lagae and Amir H. Ansari. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, Neuroscience, International Journal of Neural Systems and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact