Jan Luts

19 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers

Jan Luts
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Neurology 95
  • Biophysics 63
  • Analytical Chemistry 106
  • Cancer Research 101
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 140
Replace Ling Wei with:
Ling Wei China
Wei Kong China
Yusuke Fujita Japan
Zhenye Li China
Zhi Huang China
Steven Wang United States
Lewis E. Lipkin United States
Zilong Hu China
Arthur Tenenhaus France
Jan Luts relative to Ling Wei China Ling Wei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Ling Wei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Luts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Luts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Luts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Luts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Luts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Luts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Luts. The network helps show where Jan Luts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Luts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Luts Line = papers co-authored together Jan Luts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2010248
2 2010242
3 200771
4 200847
5 201139
6 200832
7 201125
8 201023
9 200822
10 201212
11 201310
12 20119
13 20118
14 20097
15 20146
16 20186
17 20114
18
Comparing methods for multi-class probabilities in medical decision making using LS-SVMs and kernel logistic regression
20071
19
Classification of Brain Tumors Based on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (Classificatie van hersentumoren op basis van magnetische resonantie spectroscopie)
20101
20
Differentation between brain metastasis and glioblastoma using MRI and two-dimensional Turbo spectroscopic imaging data
20090

About Jan Luts

Jan Luts is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Neurology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (4 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (2 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (95 citations), Biophysics (63 citations), Analytical Chemistry (106 citations), Cancer Research (101 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (140 citations). Jan Luts has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sabine Van Huffel, Johan A. K. Suykens, Fabian Ojeda, Bart De Moor, Raf Van de Plas, Arend Heerschap, Geert Postma, L.M.C. Buydens, Riet Hilhorst and Edda Klipp. Their work appears in journals such as NMR in Biomedicine, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Molecular Oncology and The Knowledge Engineering Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact