Jan J. Rombach

803 total citations
9 papers, 632 citations indexed

About

Jan J. Rombach is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan J. Rombach has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 632 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Oncology, 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Jan J. Rombach's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Jan J. Rombach is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Jan J. Rombach collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Jan J. Rombach's co-authors include H.J.A. Collette, F. de Waard, Nicholas Day, Cora Honing, Elwine Halewijn, G.J. van Oortmarssen, Ada T. Geerts, J. Dik F. Habbema, B. Martin van Ineveld and Harry J. de Koning and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Jan J. Rombach

8 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jan J. Rombach Netherlands	7	498	103	92	78	78	9	632
Adriano V. Laudico Philippines	13	397 0.8×	92 0.9×	132 1.4×	68 0.9×	75 1.0×	27	559
Diana S.M. Buist United States	10	420 0.8×	131 1.3×	79 0.9×	89 1.1×	97 1.2×	15	708
P C Allgood United Kingdom	15	603 1.2×	200 1.9×	102 1.1×	178 2.3×	82 1.1×	21	833
MC Lin United States	5	600 1.2×	219 2.1×	183 2.0×	98 1.3×	117 1.5×	6	777
L.S. McGinnis United States	6	263 0.5×	64 0.6×	78 0.8×	85 1.1×	43 0.6×	9	461
Alfonso Frigerio Italy	14	432 0.9×	254 2.5×	53 0.6×	106 1.4×	39 0.5×	42	718
S. A. Norman United States	10	462 0.9×	205 2.0×	62 0.7×	75 1.0×	239 3.1×	13	717
J Robert Canada	9	586 1.2×	445 4.3×	40 0.4×	194 2.5×	105 1.3×	16	955
Charles D. Cobau United States	8	276 0.6×	199 1.9×	28 0.3×	105 1.3×	70 0.9×	18	556
Harlinde De Schutter Belgium	16	428 0.9×	177 1.7×	61 0.7×	181 2.3×	44 0.6×	52	752

Countries citing papers authored by Jan J. Rombach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan J. Rombach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan J. Rombach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan J. Rombach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan J. Rombach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan J. Rombach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan J. Rombach. The network helps show where Jan J. Rombach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan J. Rombach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan J. Rombach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan J. Rombach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan J. Rombach. Jan J. Rombach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Collette, H.J.A., et al.. (1992). Further evidence of benefits of a (non-randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project.. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 46(4). 382–386. 22 indexed citations

2.

Beijerinck, David, et al.. (1991). Abdominal fat predominance in women is associated with a decreased prevalence of the high risk P2, DY mammographic breast patterns.. PubMed. 15(1). 89–93. 14 indexed citations

3.

Maas, Paul J. van der, Harry J. de Koning, B. Martin van Ineveld, et al.. (1989). The cost‐effectiveness of breast cancer screening. International Journal of Cancer. 43(6). 1055–1060. 106 indexed citations

4.

Waard, F. de, et al.. (1988). Breast cancer screening, with particular reference to the concept of ‘high risk’ groups. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 11(2). 125–132. 4 indexed citations

5.

Rombach, Jan J., et al.. (1986). Analysis of the diagnostic performance in breast cancer screening by relative operating characteristics. Cancer. 58(1). 169–177. 8 indexed citations

6.

Rombach, Jan J., et al.. (1985). Diagnosis analysis in breast cancer and cervical cancer screening. Maturitas. 7(1). 31–41.

7.

Waard, F. de, H.J.A. Collette, Jan J. Rombach, Elwine Halewijn, & Cora Honing. (1984). The dom project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 37(1). 1–44. 149 indexed citations

8.

Collette, H.J.A., Jan J. Rombach, Nicholas Day, & F. de Waard. (1984). EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER IN A NON-RANDOMISED STUDY (THE DOM PROJECT) BY MEANS OF A CASE-CONTROL STUDY. The Lancet. 323(8388). 1224–1226. 276 indexed citations

9.

Waard, F. de, et al.. (1984). Breast Cancer Risk Associated With Reproductive Factors and Breast Parenchymal Patterns. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 72(6). 1277–82. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact