James Z. Chadick

990 total citations
9 papers, 751 citations indexed

About

James Z. Chadick is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Z. Chadick has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 751 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in James Z. Chadick's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). James Z. Chadick is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). James Z. Chadick collaborates with scholars based in United States. James Z. Chadick's co-authors include Adam Gazzaley, Francisco J. Asturias, Patricia H. Janak, Susan Sangha, Aaron M. Rutman, Wesley C. Clapp, Theodore P. Zanto, Iris Cheung, Andrzej Witkowski and Sean C. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

James Z. Chadick

9 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Z. Chadick United States 9 423 226 65 59 57 9 751
Eun A Choi South Korea 13 247 0.6× 146 0.6× 21 0.3× 91 1.5× 225 3.9× 40 630
Sara Sannino Italy 16 128 0.3× 270 1.2× 79 1.2× 222 3.8× 118 2.1× 24 827
David Holzberg Germany 5 163 0.4× 139 0.6× 93 1.4× 21 0.4× 195 3.4× 5 677
Paul Michenthaler Austria 12 244 0.6× 161 0.7× 80 1.2× 27 0.5× 104 1.8× 16 608
Hany Goubran‐Botros France 10 167 0.4× 181 0.8× 53 0.8× 15 0.3× 49 0.9× 13 545
Clara Sava‐Segal United States 10 185 0.4× 129 0.6× 47 0.7× 27 0.5× 95 1.7× 16 413
Teresa F. Burke United States 15 151 0.4× 299 1.3× 10 0.2× 87 1.5× 204 3.6× 29 867
Megan Chesnut United States 10 131 0.3× 95 0.4× 99 1.5× 20 0.3× 54 0.9× 12 453
Renzhi Yang China 13 148 0.3× 347 1.5× 13 0.2× 90 1.5× 243 4.3× 18 863
Ximing Li China 18 124 0.3× 384 1.7× 36 0.6× 23 0.4× 246 4.3× 42 875

Countries citing papers authored by James Z. Chadick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Z. Chadick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Z. Chadick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Z. Chadick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Z. Chadick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Z. Chadick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Z. Chadick. The network helps show where James Z. Chadick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Z. Chadick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Z. Chadick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Z. Chadick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Z. Chadick. James Z. Chadick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Chadick, James Z., Theodore P. Zanto, & Adam Gazzaley. (2014). Structural and functional differences in medial prefrontal cortex underlie distractibility and suppression deficits in ageing. Nature Communications. 5(1). 4223–4223. 59 indexed citations
2.
Sangha, Susan, James Z. Chadick, & Patricia H. Janak. (2013). Safety Encoding in the Basal Amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(9). 3744–3751. 102 indexed citations
3.
Zanto, Theodore P., James Z. Chadick, Gabriela Satris, & Adam Gazzaley. (2013). Rapid Functional Reorganization in Human Cortex Following Neural Perturbation. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(41). 16268–16274. 10 indexed citations
4.
Zanto, Theodore P., James Z. Chadick, & Adam Gazzaley. (2013). Anticipatory alpha phase influences visual working memory performance. NeuroImage. 85. 794–802. 12 indexed citations
5.
Chadick, James Z. & Adam Gazzaley. (2011). Differential coupling of visual cortex with default or frontal-parietal network based on goals. Nature Neuroscience. 14(7). 830–832. 181 indexed citations
6.
Rutman, Aaron M., Wesley C. Clapp, James Z. Chadick, & Adam Gazzaley. (2009). Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22(6). 1224–1234. 113 indexed citations
7.
Takagi, Yuichiro, et al.. (2005). Preponderance of Free Mediator in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(35). 31200–31207. 13 indexed citations
8.
Chadick, James Z. & Francisco J. Asturias. (2005). Structure of eukaryotic Mediator complexes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 30(5). 264–271. 130 indexed citations
9.
Asturias, Francisco J., James Z. Chadick, Iris Cheung, et al.. (2005). Structure and molecular organization of mammalian fatty acid synthase. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 12(3). 225–232. 131 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026