James Wren

614 total citations
27 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

James Wren is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Wren has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in James Wren's work include Sperm and Testicular Function (9 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (7 papers). James Wren is often cited by papers focused on Sperm and Testicular Function (9 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers) and Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (7 papers). James Wren collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Switzerland. James Wren's co-authors include Paul Russo, Jonathan Coleman, Shugaku Takeda, Mithat Gönen, A. Ari Hakimi, Robert J. Motzer, Satish K. Tickoo, Adriana Heguy, Omar Abdel‐Wahab and Victor E. Reuter and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, European Urology and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

James Wren

26 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Wren United States 7 171 170 120 94 68 27 448
Cynthia Dela Cruz Brazil 12 15 0.1× 166 1.0× 38 0.3× 27 0.3× 4 0.1× 37 558
B.S. Ward United Kingdom 11 40 0.2× 56 0.3× 43 0.4× 18 0.2× 5 0.1× 24 405
Ilpo Kinnunen Finland 11 62 0.4× 98 0.6× 9 0.1× 48 0.5× 23 0.3× 22 520
Nehama Zuckerman‐Levin Israel 16 52 0.3× 193 1.1× 244 2.0× 19 0.2× 2 0.0× 37 620
Tadayuki Ayabe Japan 10 19 0.1× 75 0.4× 130 1.1× 6 0.1× 5 0.1× 24 384
Doğa Türkkahraman Türkiye 12 21 0.1× 133 0.8× 104 0.9× 9 0.1× 4 0.1× 33 381
Sarah Cross United States 12 46 0.3× 91 0.5× 12 0.1× 16 0.2× 2 0.0× 34 437
Ruth McGowan United Kingdom 16 28 0.2× 457 2.7× 379 3.2× 7 0.1× 3 0.0× 43 677
Ana Monteagudo Spain 17 31 0.2× 305 1.8× 209 1.7× 25 0.3× 2 0.0× 45 774
Amanda Harris United Kingdom 12 438 2.6× 89 0.5× 150 1.3× 5 0.1× 4 0.1× 28 642

Countries citing papers authored by James Wren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Wren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Wren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Wren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Wren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Wren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Wren. The network helps show where James Wren may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Wren

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Wren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Wren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Wren. James Wren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Wren, James, Minh N. Pham, Joshua A. Halpern, et al.. (2023). A Prior History of Cryptozoospermia Is Associated with a Significantly Higher Chance of a Successful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Compared to Non-Obstructive Azoospermia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(23). 7255–7255. 2 indexed citations
3.
Pham, Minh N., Richard J Fantus, Mary Kate Keeter, et al.. (2022). Characteristics of men who use direct-to-consumer men’s health telemedicine services. International Journal of Impotence Research. 35(8). 753–757. 4 indexed citations
4.
Pham, Minh N., Richard J Fantus, James Wren, et al.. (2022). Reproductive urologic consultation in subfertile men: predictors of establishing care and patient perceptions after abnormal semen testing. Fertility and Sterility. 117(3). 489–496. 2 indexed citations
5.
Pham, Minh N., Aisha L. Siebert, Justin M. Dubin, et al.. (2022). Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Use is Not Associated With Impaired Semen Parameters. Urology. 164. 140–144. 6 indexed citations
6.
Fantus, Richard J, et al.. (2021). Prevalence of Hyperprolactinemia and Clinically Apparent Prolactinomas in Men Undergoing Fertility Evaluation. Urology. 159. 114–119. 9 indexed citations
7.
Greene, Lisa I., Minh N. Pham, Richard J Fantus, et al.. (2021). Perceptions of Infertility and Semen Analysis Testing Among American Men Without Children. Urology. 158. 95–101. 6 indexed citations
8.
Pham, Minh N., Richard J Fantus, James Wren, et al.. (2021). The adverse association between stimulant use for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and semen parameters. Andrologia. 54(2). e14315–e14315. 5 indexed citations
9.
Wren, James, et al.. (2020). MP44-05 DOES RESIDUAL TESTICULAR VOLUME FOLLOWING PARTIAL ORCHIECTOMY FOR MALIGNANCY IMPACT THE RISK OF HYPOGONADISM?. The Journal of Urology. 203. e657–e658. 1 indexed citations
10.
Halpern, Joshua A., Richard J Fantus, Mary Kate Keeter, et al.. (2020). Underutilization of primary medical care among men presenting for fertility evaluation. F&S Reports. 1(1). 9–14. 3 indexed citations
11.
Cooley, Lauren Folgosa, et al.. (2020). Anti-TNF agents and potential effects on male fertility: are men being counseled?. BMC Urology. 20(1). 111–111. 2 indexed citations
12.
Fantus, Richard J, James Wren, Eric Yi‐Hsiu Huang, et al.. (2020). Do partial AZFc deletions affect the sperm retrieval rate in non-mosaic Klinefelter patients undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction?. BMC Urology. 20(1). 21–21. 10 indexed citations
13.
Das, Arighno, et al.. (2020). Sperm retrieval success and testicular histopathology in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian Journal of Andrology. 22(6). 555–555. 15 indexed citations
14.
Halpern, Joshua A., Richard J Fantus, Mary Kate Keeter, et al.. (2019). Underutilization of primary medical care among men presenting for fertility evaluation. Fertility and Sterility. 112(3). e63–e63. 4 indexed citations
15.
Wren, James, et al.. (2018). Clinical Consultation Guide on Imaging in Male Infertility and Sexual dysfunction. European Urology Focus. 4(3). 338–347. 1 indexed citations
16.
Wren, James, et al.. (2018). A rare complication; retained needle during intracavernosal injection for erectile dysfunction. Urology Case Reports. 20. 51–53. 2 indexed citations
18.
Spaliviero, Massimiliano, Nicholas Power, Katie S. Murray, et al.. (2017). Intravenous Mannitol Versus Placebo During Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Normal Kidney Function: A Double-blind, Clinically-integrated, Randomized Trial. European Urology. 73(1). 53–59. 36 indexed citations
19.
Kahn, Barbara E., Daniel J. Mazur, James Wren, et al.. (2017). MP79-04 CONTEMPORARY REPORT OF A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH FOURNIER's GANGRENE. The Journal of Urology. 197(4S). 2 indexed citations
20.
Hakimi, A. Ari, Ying‐Bei Chen, James Wren, et al.. (2012). Clinical and Pathologic Impact of Select Chromatin-modulating Tumor Suppressors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. European Urology. 63(5). 848–854. 174 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026